Literature DB >> 26659205

Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Toxins for Optimized Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection.

Nira R Pollock1.   

Abstract

Recently developed ultrasensitive and quantitative methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins provide new tools for diagnosis and, potentially, for management of C. difficile infection (CDI). Compared to methods that detect toxigenic organism, ultrasensitive toxin detection may allow diagnosis of CDI with increased clinical specificity, without sacrificing clinical sensitivity; measurement of toxin levels may also provide information relevant to disease prognosis. This minireview provides an overview of these new toxin detection technologies and considers what these new tools might add to the field.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659205      PMCID: PMC4733189          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02419-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  42 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; H C Krivan; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay.

Authors:  S Johnson; S A Kent; K J O'Leary; M M Merrigan; S P Sambol; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Correlation of disease severity with fecal toxin levels in patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and distribution of PCR ribotypes and toxin yields in vitro of corresponding isolates.

Authors:  Thomas Akerlund; Bo Svenungsson; Asa Lagergren; Lars G Burman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Induction of toxins in Clostridium difficile is associated with dramatic changes of its metabolism.

Authors:  Sture Karlsson; Lars G Burman; Thomas Åkerlund
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Single toxin detection is inadequate to diagnose Clostridium difficile diarrhea in pediatric patients.

Authors:  H A Kader; D A Piccoli; A F Jawad; K L McGowan; E S Maller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Anti-Clostridium difficile bovine immunoglobulin concentrate inhibits cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity of C. difficile toxins.

Authors:  C P Kelly; C Pothoulakis; F Vavva; I Castagliuolo; E F Bostwick; J C O'Keane; S Keates; J T LaMont
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  An ultrasensitive rapid immunocytotoxicity assay for detecting Clostridium difficile toxins.

Authors:  Xiangyun He; Jufang Wang; Jennifer Steele; Xingmin Sun; Weijia Nie; Saul Tzipori; Hanping Feng
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  Clostridium difficile toxin B is more potent than toxin A in damaging human colonic epithelium in vitro.

Authors:  M Riegler; R Sedivy; C Pothoulakis; G Hamilton; J Zacherl; G Bischof; E Cosentini; W Feil; R Schiessel; J T LaMont
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Dena Lyras; Jennifer R O'Connor; Pauline M Howarth; Susan P Sambol; Glen P Carter; Tongted Phumoonna; Rachael Poon; Vicki Adams; Gayatri Vedantam; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Julian I Rood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Jeffrey E Topal; Joel Estis; Phoebe Katzenbach; Niamh Nolan; Johanna Sandlund
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Amelita Bartolome; Anna Almazan; Stanley Tam; Sheryl Biscocho; Salina Abusali; Jeffrey J Bishop; Niamh Nolan; Joel Estis; John Todd; Stephen Young; Fiona Senchyna; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Organic Electrochemical Transistors as Versatile Tool for Real-Time and Automatized Viral Cytopathic Effect Evaluation.

Authors:  Francesco Decataldo; Catia Giovannini; Laura Grumiro; Maria Michela Marino; Francesca Faccin; Martina Brandolini; Giorgio Dirani; Francesca Taddei; Davide Lelli; Marta Tessarolo; Maria Calienni; Carla Cacciotto; Alessandra Mistral De Pascali; Antonio Lavazza; Beatrice Fraboni; Vittorio Sambri; Alessandra Scagliarini
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.818

5.  Rapid Quantification of C. difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin B (TcdB) with a NanoBiT Split-Luciferase Assay.

Authors:  Hope Adamson; Modupe O Ajayi; Kate E Gilroy; Michael J McPherson; Darren C Tomlinson; Lars J C Jeuken
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 8.008

6.  Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.

Authors:  Roosa Savolainen; Juha M Koskinen; Silja Mentula; Janne O Koskinen; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid visual detection of binary toxin producing Clostridium difficile by loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Authors:  Lan Yu; Huan Li; Xiangna Zhao; Xuesong Wang; Xiao Wei; Weishi Lin; Puyuan Li; Lihong Cui; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  A Rapid, Accurate, Single Molecule Counting Method Detects Clostridium difficile Toxin B in Stool Samples.

Authors:  Sadanand Gite; Destiny Archambault; Michael P Cappillino; David Cunha; Victoria Dorich; Tatyana Shatova; Andrew Tempesta; Bruce Walsh; Jessica A Walsh; Adam Williams; James E Kirby; Jayson Bowers; Don Straus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Diagnostic stewardship and the 2017 update of the IDSA-SHEA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Melinda D Poulter; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-25

10.  Two-step Testing for Clostridioides Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection From Colonization in Children.

Authors:  Jacob M Parnell; Irtiqa Fazili; Sarah C Bloch; D Borden Lacy; Valeria A Garcia-Lopez; Rachel Bernard; Eric P Skaar; Kathryn M Edwards; Maribeth R Nicholson
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.