Literature DB >> 26195949

Use of BioPatch® (Protective Disk with Chlorhexidine Gluconate) in Closed-Suction Drainage for Penile Implant Surgery.

Jacob Khurgin1, Bruce Garber2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of closed-suction drains after penile implant surgery remains controversial. The use of BioPatch®, a protective disk with chlorhexidine gluconate, may reduce the incidence of drain-related infections, one of the feared complications of drains. The aim of this study is to describe a novel use of BioPatch® in penile implant surgery as well as additional techniques that may potentially minimize infection rates.
METHODS: A description of operative technique and a review of the literature will be presented. A novel approach to penile implant surgery that may reduce infection rates is described.
RESULTS: A simple technique is described for surgeons considering implementation of closed-suction drains after penile implant surgery.
CONCLUSION: Although randomized controlled studies looking at drain placement following penile implant surgery are lacking, the addition of BioPatch® and the implementation of surgical techniques as described are potentially helpful in preventing infection following this surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BioPatch®; Chlorhexidine gluconate; Closed-suction drain; Infection; Penile implant; Penile prosthesis surgery; Protective disk

Year:  2014        PMID: 26195949      PMCID: PMC4483297          DOI: 10.1159/000365674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  17 in total

Review 1.  Penile prosthesis surgery: a review of prosthetic devices and associated complications.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Absence of capsular contracture in 319 consecutive augmentation mammaplasties: Dependent drains as a possible factor.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous; Iman Salem; Carolyne Tawilé; Ae Bassas
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

4.  Clinical evaluation of closed suction drainage following hepatectomy.

Authors:  S Uetsuji; A H Kwon; H Komada; Y Okuda; A Imamura; Y Kamiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  H Sadeghi-Nejad; P Ilbeigi; S K Wilson; J R Delk; A Siegel; A D Seftel; L Shannon; H Jung
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection.

Authors:  C C Carson
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heiner Ruschulte; Matthias Franke; Petra Gastmeier; Sebastian Zenz; Karl H Mahr; Stefanie Buchholz; Bernd Hertenstein; Hartmut Hecker; Siegfried Piepenbrock
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.673

8.  Urological symptomatology in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

Authors:  M B Chancellor; P J Shenot; D A Rivas; S Mandel; R J Schwartzman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The effect of closed-suction drains on the incidence of local wound complications following tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Babak J Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.

Authors:  J J Raves; M Slifkin; D L Diamond
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.