Literature DB >> 14551594

Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection.

C C Carson1.   

Abstract

The implantation of inflatable penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction continues to be widely practiced in the United States and internationally. As third-line therapy for erectile dysfunction, the numbers of implants continue to rise as the population of men treated for erectile dysfunction increases. Complications of penile prosthesis implantation continued to decline as mechanical malfunctions have decreased as a result of re-engineering inflatable penile prostheses. Inflatable penile prostheses from both available vendors continue to be reliable, effective methods for restoring erectile function with high satisfaction rates. The most troublesome complication of these prostheses, however, is not mechanical but rather that of prosthesis infection. Prosthesis infections may result in further surgery, loss of penile tissue, and even the inability to replace penile prosthesis. While standard sterile technique perioperative antibiotics and careful surgical procedures continue to be the cornerstone of penile prosthesis infection avoidance, newer designs of penile prostheses for antibiotic coating have resulted in an improvement in the prevalence and incidents of penile prosthesis infection. For those patients in whom penile prostheses become infected despite adequate prophylaxis, newer techniques of salvage have demonstrated increasing success. Once and still the most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis implantation, prothesis infections can now be avoided by perioperative preparation and antibiotics as well as antibiotic-coated penile prostheses. Treatment of penile prosthesis infections once associated with severe loss of function can often be successful with modern salvage techniques. Implanting urologists must be familiar prophylaxis, avoidance, and treatment of penile prosthesis infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551594     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  22 in total

1.  An unusual surgical success with a defective penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Bo Ram Choi; Young Beom Jeong; Jong Kwan Park
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Radiological assessment of penile prosthesis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ignacio Moncada; José Jara; Ramiro Cabello; Juan Ignacio Monzo; Carlos Hernández
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Surgery: centers of excellence for penile prosthesis: yes or no?

Authors:  Tariq F Al-Shaiji; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  A technique for improved skin isolation and a more visible operative field during penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  N A Faure Walker; D Eldred-Evans; S Willis; P K Hegarty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Conservative Therapy is an Effective Option in Patients With Localized Infection After Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Mohammed Farag; Ben Williamson; Osama Laban; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Usama Kamil; Saleh Binsaleh; Raanan Tal; David Ralph; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  A population-based analysis of contemporary rates of reoperation for penile prosthesis procedures.

Authors:  Shaun Grewal; Joel Vetter; Steven B Brandes; Seth A Strope
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures.

Authors:  Magnus Grabe; Henry Botto; Mete Cek; Peter Tenke; Florian M E Wagenlehner; Kurt G Naber; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Use of BioPatch® (Protective Disk with Chlorhexidine Gluconate) in Closed-Suction Drainage for Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Khurgin; Bruce Garber
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-08-20

9.  Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a predictor of early penile prosthesis implant infection.

Authors:  Deniz Bolat; Yusuf Kadir Topcu; Ozgu Aydogdu; Suleyman Minareci; Cetin Dincel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  MRI of the penis.

Authors:  A Kirkham
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.