Literature DB >> 9086543

Clinical evaluation of closed suction drainage following hepatectomy.

S Uetsuji1, A H Kwon, H Komada, Y Okuda, A Imamura, Y Kamiyama.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized study on 186 patients was conducted to determine the influence of closed suction drainage (n = 102) versus open drainage (n = 84) on the incidence of postoperative complications after elective hepatic resection. The patients were randomly allocated between the two groups. A total of 60 complications occurred in 31 of the 84 patients (36.9%) given open drainage, while 24 complications occurred in 15 of the 102 patients (14.7%) given closed suction drainage. The incidence of pleural effusion, postoperative ascites, and infected subphrenic collections was significantly lower in the closed suction drainage group than in the open drainage group, at 31% vs 16% (P < 0.05), 19% vs 3% (P < 0.01), and 17% vs 5% (P < 0.05) respectively. However, both groups showed similar rates of subphrenic hematoma and bile collection. These findings indicate that closed suction drainage significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative complications after elective hepatic resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9086543     DOI: 10.1007/bf00941801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  17 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal drainage: a clinical review.

Authors:  T W O'Connor; T B Hugh
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1979-04

2.  Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds.

Authors:  T R WAUGH; F E STINCHFIELD
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Observations on wound drainage with a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Golovsky; W B Conolly
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1976-03-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  Preoperative and postoperative care.

Authors:  H H Stone
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

6.  Intraperitoneal drainage.

Authors:  M Levy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Historical and current perspectives on surgical drainage.

Authors:  J P Moss
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-04

8.  Drainage of the abdomen.

Authors:  H L Duthie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Suction drainage. A study in wound healing.

Authors:  A I Maitland; A J Mathieson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Hepatic complications.

Authors:  S Iwatsuki; W P Geis
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Drainages in abdominal surgery: (in)dispensable?]

Authors:  B Globke; M Schmelzle; M Bahra; J Pratschke; J Neudecker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Comparison of Adverse Events and Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Drain Insertion After Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched, Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Japan (CSGO-HBP-001).

Authors:  Terumasa Yamada; Kunihito Gotoh; Shigeru Marubashi; Tadafumi Asaoka; Atsushi Miyamoto; Shogo Kobayashi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Junzo Shimizu; Yongkook Kim; Masanori Tsujie; Takehiro Noda; Shigekazu Yokoyama; Yutaka Takeda; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Use of BioPatch® (Protective Disk with Chlorhexidine Gluconate) in Closed-Suction Drainage for Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Khurgin; Bruce Garber
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-08-20

4.  Timing for removing prophylactic drains after liver resection: an evaluation of drain removal on the third and first postoperative days.

Authors:  Akihiko Ichida; Yoshiharu Kono; Masumitsu Sato; Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Junichi Kaneko; Junichi Arita; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus conventional open treatment of hepatic cystic hydatidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Hai-Hong Zhu; Jin-Yu Yang; Yan Wang; Zhi-Gang Gai; Fu-Cai Ma; De-Wu Yang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.