Literature DB >> 6496851

A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.

J J Raves, M Slifkin, D L Diamond.   

Abstract

A simple experimental study was designed to determine if closed suction drainage reduces the migration of pathogenic bacteria along a drain tract. Sixty New Zealand rabbits, equally divided into three groups, were splenectomized through midline incisions. Group I served as the control group and received no drainage. Groups II and III had drainage of the splenic bed with simple latex conduit drains (Penrose drains) and closed suction drains (Jackson-Pratt drains), respectively. The skin near the drain exit site was inoculated with a Streptococcus organism. The animals were sacrificed after 72 hours, and intraperitoneal culture specimens were obtained. None of the control rabbits had positive cultures on intraperitoneal specimens. Eighteen of 20 rabbits (90 percent) in Group II (Penrose) had positive cultures on specimens from the splenic bed, whereas 75 percent had positive cultures on drain specimens. Only 4 of 20 (20 percent) of the Group III rabbits had positive cultures on the drain or splenic bed specimens. This difference was statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p less than 0.001). Retrograde migration of bacteria along a drain tract does occur with relatively high frequency with simple conduit drainage and is significantly less with closed suction drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6496851     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90336-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  22 in total

1.  [The value of wound drainage with or without suction].

Authors:  J Schmidt; A Hasselbach; W Schnorr; T Baranek; R Letsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Wound drainages in total hip arthroplasty: to use or not to use? Review of the literature on current practice.

Authors:  M Nanni; F Perna; C Calamelli; D Donati; O Ferrara; A Parlato; M D'Arienzo; C Faldini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-25

3.  Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients.

Authors:  Peter K Baier; Nadine C Glück; Ulrich Baumgartner; Ulrich Adam; Andreas Fischer; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Surgical drain after open or laparoscopic splenectomy: is it needed or contraindicated?

Authors:  R Vecchio; E Intagliata; S Marchese; S Battaglia; R R Cacciola; E Cacciola
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 May-Jun

5.  Influence of wound drainage in primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet.

Authors:  Sven Märdian; Georg Matziolis; Philipp Schwabe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Occurrence of intraperitoneal septic complications after hepatic resections between 1985 and 1990.

Authors:  T Matsumata; K Yanaga; M Shimada; K Shirabe; A Taketomi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Open and closed suction drainage after hepatic resection.

Authors:  T Nishizaki; T Matsumata; K Yanaga; M Shimada; H Higashi; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Bacterial growth on drain tips after total hip replacement. A controlled culture method.

Authors:  R Gunterberg; B Bergmann; A Brandberg; J Karlsson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-05

9.  Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Wilson Salgado Júnior; Marcelo Martins Macedo Neto; José Sebastião dos Santos; Ajith Kumar Sakarankutty; Reginaldo Ceneviva; Orlando de Castro e Silva
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A prospective, randomized trial of abdominal wound drainage in gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  D Shaffer; P N Benotti; A Bothe; R L Jenkins; G L Blackburn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.