Andrew M Ryan1, Stephen M Shortell2, Patricia P Ramsay2, Lawrence P Casalino3. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan amryan@umich.edu. 2. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California. 3. Division of Healthcare Policy and Economics, Department of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accountable care organization (ACO) is a new organizational form to manage patients across the continuum of care. There are numerous questions about how ACOs should be optimally structured, including compensation arrangements with primary care physicians. METHODS: Using data from a national survey of physician practices, we compared primary care physicians' compensation between practices in ACOs and practices that varied in their financial risk for primary care costs using 3 groups: practices not participating in a Medicare ACO and with no substantial risk for primary care costs; practices not participating in an ACO but with substantial risk for primary care costs; and practices participating in an ACO regardless of their risk for primary care costs. We measured physicians' compensation as the percentage of compensation based on salary, productivity, clinical quality or patient experience, and other factors. Regression models estimated physician compensation as a function of ACO participation and risk for primary care costs while controlling for other practice characteristics. RESULTS: Physicians in ACO and non-ACO practices with no substantial risk for costs on average received nearly one-half of their compensation from salary, slightly less from productivity, and about 5% from quality and other factors. Physicians not in ACOs but with substantial risk for primary care costs received two-thirds of their compensation from salary, nearly one-third from productivity, and slightly more than 1% from quality and other factors. Participation in ACOs was associated with significantly higher physician compensation for quality; however, participation was not significantly associated with compensation from salary, whereas financial risk was associated with much greater compensation from salary. CONCLUSION: Although practices in ACOs provide higher compensation for quality, compared with practices at large, they provide a similar mix of compensation based on productivity and salary. Incentives for ACOs may not be sufficiently strong to encourage practices to change physician compensation policies for better patient experience, improved population health, and lower per capita costs.
BACKGROUND: The accountable care organization (ACO) is a new organizational form to manage patients across the continuum of care. There are numerous questions about how ACOs should be optimally structured, including compensation arrangements with primary care physicians. METHODS: Using data from a national survey of physician practices, we compared primary care physicians' compensation between practices in ACOs and practices that varied in their financial risk for primary care costs using 3 groups: practices not participating in a Medicare ACO and with no substantial risk for primary care costs; practices not participating in an ACO but with substantial risk for primary care costs; and practices participating in an ACO regardless of their risk for primary care costs. We measured physicians' compensation as the percentage of compensation based on salary, productivity, clinical quality or patient experience, and other factors. Regression models estimated physician compensation as a function of ACO participation and risk for primary care costs while controlling for other practice characteristics. RESULTS: Physicians in ACO and non-ACO practices with no substantial risk for costs on average received nearly one-half of their compensation from salary, slightly less from productivity, and about 5% from quality and other factors. Physicians not in ACOs but with substantial risk for primary care costs received two-thirds of their compensation from salary, nearly one-third from productivity, and slightly more than 1% from quality and other factors. Participation in ACOs was associated with significantly higher physician compensation for quality; however, participation was not significantly associated with compensation from salary, whereas financial risk was associated with much greater compensation from salary. CONCLUSION: Although practices in ACOs provide higher compensation for quality, compared with practices at large, they provide a similar mix of compensation based on productivity and salary. Incentives for ACOs may not be sufficiently strong to encourage practices to change physician compensation policies for better patient experience, improved population health, and lower per capita costs.
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Stephen M Shortell; Robin R Gillies; Lawrence P Casalino; James C Robinson; Rodney K McCurdy; Juned Siddique Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: James C Robinson; Stephen M Shortell; Diane R Rittenhouse; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Robin R Gillies; Lawrence P Casalino Journal: Inquiry Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; M Richard McKellar; James D Reschovsky; Jack Hadley Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ishani Ganguli; Claire Lupo; Alexander J Mainor; Endel John Orav; Bonnie B Blanchfield; Valerie A Lewis; Carrie H Colla Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz; Daniel J Tancredi; Elizabeth Magnan; Klea D Bertakis; Peter Franks Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Adam A Markovitz; Michael D Rozier; Andrew M Ryan; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Edward C Norton; Timothy A Peterson; John M Hollingsworth Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Meredith Rosenthal; Stephen Shortell; Nilay D Shah; David Peiris; Valerie A Lewis; Jacob A Barrera; Benjamin Usadi; Carrie H Colla Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: David Peiris; Madeleine C Phipps-Taylor; Courtney A Stachowski; Lee-Sien Kao; Stephen M Shortell; Valerie A Lewis; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 6.301