Anthony Jerant1, Joshua J Fenton1, Richard L Kravitz2, Daniel J Tancredi3, Elizabeth Magnan1, Klea D Bertakis1, Peter Franks1. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 2. Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Abstract
Importance: Prior studies suggesting clinician fulfillment or denial of requests affects patient satisfaction included limited adjustment for patient confounders. The studies also did not examine distinct request types, yet patient expectations and clinician fulfillment or denial might vary among request types. Objective: To examine how patient satisfaction with the clinician is associated with clinician denial of distinct types of patient requests, adjusting for patient characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional observational study of 1319 outpatient visits to family physicians (n = 56) by 1141 adults at one Northern California academic health center. Main Outcomes and Measures: We used 6 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey items to measure patient satisfaction with the visit physician. Standardized items were averaged to form the satisfaction score (Cronbach α = 0.80), which was then percentile-transformed. Seven separate linear mixed-effects models examined the adjusted mean differences in patient satisfaction percentile associated with denial of each of the following requests (if present)-referral, pain medication, antibiotic, other new medication, laboratory test, radiology test, or other test-compared with fulfillment of the respective requests. The models adjusted for patient sociodemographics, weight, health status, personality, worry over health, prior visit with clinician, and the other 6 request categories and their dispositions. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 1141 patients was 45.6 (16.1) years, and 902 (68.4%) were female. Among 1319 visits, 897 (68.0%) included at least 1 request; 1441 (85.2%) were fulfilled. Requests by category were referral, 294 (21.1%); pain medication, 271 (20.5%); antibiotic, 107 (8.1%); other new medication, 271 (20.5%); laboratory test, 448 (34.0%); radiology test, 153 (11.6%); and other tests, 147 (11.1%). Compared with fulfillment of the respective request type, clinician denials of requests for referral, pain medication, other new medication, and laboratory test were associated with worse satisfaction (adjusted mean percentile differences, -19.75 [95% CI, -30.75 to -8.74], -10.72 [95% CI, -19.66 to -1.78], -20.36 [95% CI, -29.54 to -11.18], and -9.19 [95% CI, -17.50 to -0.87]), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinician denial of some types of requests was associated with worse patient satisfaction with the clinician, but not for others, when compared with fulfillment of the requests. In an era of patient satisfaction-driven compensation, the findings suggest the need to train clinicians to deal effectively with requests, potentially enhancing patient and clinician experiences.
Importance: Prior studies suggesting clinician fulfillment or denial of requests affects patient satisfaction included limited adjustment for patient confounders. The studies also did not examine distinct request types, yet patient expectations and clinician fulfillment or denial might vary among request types. Objective: To examine how patient satisfaction with the clinician is associated with clinician denial of distinct types of patient requests, adjusting for patient characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional observational study of 1319 outpatient visits to family physicians (n = 56) by 1141 adults at one Northern California academic health center. Main Outcomes and Measures: We used 6 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey items to measure patient satisfaction with the visit physician. Standardized items were averaged to form the satisfaction score (Cronbach α = 0.80), which was then percentile-transformed. Seven separate linear mixed-effects models examined the adjusted mean differences in patient satisfaction percentile associated with denial of each of the following requests (if present)-referral, pain medication, antibiotic, other new medication, laboratory test, radiology test, or other test-compared with fulfillment of the respective requests. The models adjusted for patient sociodemographics, weight, health status, personality, worry over health, prior visit with clinician, and the other 6 request categories and their dispositions. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 1141 patients was 45.6 (16.1) years, and 902 (68.4%) were female. Among 1319 visits, 897 (68.0%) included at least 1 request; 1441 (85.2%) were fulfilled. Requests by category were referral, 294 (21.1%); pain medication, 271 (20.5%); antibiotic, 107 (8.1%); other new medication, 271 (20.5%); laboratory test, 448 (34.0%); radiology test, 153 (11.6%); and other tests, 147 (11.1%). Compared with fulfillment of the respective request type, clinician denials of requests for referral, pain medication, other new medication, and laboratory test were associated with worse satisfaction (adjusted mean percentile differences, -19.75 [95% CI, -30.75 to -8.74], -10.72 [95% CI, -19.66 to -1.78], -20.36 [95% CI, -29.54 to -11.18], and -9.19 [95% CI, -17.50 to -0.87]), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinician denial of some types of requests was associated with worse patient satisfaction with the clinician, but not for others, when compared with fulfillment of the requests. In an era of patient satisfaction-driven compensation, the findings suggest the need to train clinicians to deal effectively with requests, potentially enhancing patient and clinician experiences.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Marloes A van Bokhoven; Marjolein C H Pleunis-van Empel; Hèlen Koch; Richard P T M Grol; Geert-Jan Dinant; Trudy van der Weijden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Kathryn A Martinez; Mark Rood; Nikhyl Jhangiani; Lei Kou; Adrienne Boissy; Michael B Rothberg Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Kevin Fiscella; Joshua J Fenton; Elizabeth M Magnan; Alicia Agnoli; Peter Franks Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Aditi Patel; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Anita D Misra Hebert; Alexander Chaitoff; Aryeh Shapiro; Niyati Gupta; Michael B Rothberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nazanene H Esfandiari; David Reyes-Gastelum; Sarah T Hawley; Megan R Haymart; Maria Papaleontiou Journal: Thyroid Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Caitlin Vayro; Ajit Narayanan; Michael Greco; Neil Spike; Jan Hanson; Ben Mitchell; Dale Hanson; Rebecca Stewart Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Edward Stenehjem; Anthony Wallin; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Whitney R Buckel; Valoree Stanfield; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Jeff Sorensen; Matthew H Samore; Raj Srivastava; Lauri A Hicks; Adam L Hersh Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Andrew R Stephens; Angela P Presson; Danli Chen; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Anna Song Beeber; Christine E Kistler; Sheryl Zimmerman; Cassandra Dictus; Kimberly Ward; Claire Farel; Keith Chrzan; Christopher J Wretman; Marcella Boyton-Hansen; Michael Pignone; Philip D Sloane Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.669