Literature DB >> 19694390

Quality-based payment for medical groups and individual physicians.

James C Robinson1, Stephen M Shortell, Diane R Rittenhouse, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Robin R Gillies, Lawrence P Casalino.   

Abstract

This paper measures the extent to which medical groups experience external pay-for-performance incentives based on quality and patient satisfaction and the extent to which these groups pay their primary care and specialist physicians using similar criteria. Over half (52%) of large medical groups received bonus payments from health insurance plans in the period 2006-2007 based on measures of quality and patient satisfaction. Medical groups facing external pay-for-performance incentives are more likely to pay their primary care physicians (odds ratio [OR] 4.5; p<.001) and specialists (OR 2.5; p=.07) based on quality and satisfaction. Groups facing capitation payment incentives to control costs are more likely to pay member physicians on salary and less likely to pay based on productivity (p<.001 for primary care; p<.05 for specialists) than groups paid by insurers on a fee-for-service basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694390     DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_46.02.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  11 in total

1.  Bundled payment systems: can they be more successful this time.

Authors:  Michael Chernew
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Use of care management practices in small- and medium-sized physician groups: do public reporting of physician quality and financial incentives matter?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Daniel Maeng; Lawrence P Casalino; Diane Rittenhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; James F Burgess; Michael F Pesko; William B Borden; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jennifer Neuman; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Salary and Quality Compensation for Physician Practices Participating in Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Stephen M Shortell; Patricia P Ramsay; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  How Does Caregiver Well-Being Relate to Perceived Quality of Care in Patients With Cancer? Exploring Associations and Pathways.

Authors:  Kristin Litzelman; Erin E Kent; Michelle Mollica; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Capitated versus fee-for-service reimbursement and quality of care for chronic disease: a US cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Sri Lekha Tummalapalli; Michelle M Estrella; Deanna P Jannat-Khah; Salomeh Keyhani; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England.

Authors:  Martin Roland; Marc Elliott; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Josephine Barbiere; Richard A Parker; Patten Smith; Peter Bower; John Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-29

9.  The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  A Health Care Value Framework for Physical Therapy Primary Health Care Organizations.

Authors:  Rutger Friso IJntema; Di-Janne Barten; Hans B Duits; Brian V Tjemkes; Cindy Veenhof
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2021 Jan/Mar 01       Impact factor: 1.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.