Literature DB >> 27803239

The Roles of Dyadic Appraisal and Coping in Couples With Lung Cancer.

Karen S Lyons1, Lyndsey M Miller2, Michael J McCarthy3.   

Abstract

Given the high symptom burden and low survivability of lung cancer, patients and their spouses have been found to experience poor mental health. The current study examined the roles of dyadic appraisal and dyadic coping on the mental health of 78 couples living with non-small cell lung cancer. Multilevel modeling revealed that spouses, on average, reported significantly worse mental health than patients. Dyadic appraisal and dyadic coping played important roles in predicting mental health, controlling for known developmental and contextual covariates. Dyadic appraisal of the patient's pain and fatigue was significantly associated with spouse mental health, albeit in opposite directions. Dyadic coping significantly predicted patient mental health. The study underlines the need to incorporate routine screening of both patient and spouse mental health, and highlights the complex role of appraisal within the couple in a life-threatening context. Viewing the couple as a unit, rather than separate individuals, raises important awareness about the role of disparate illness appraisals and coping strategies within the dyad on the health of both members. Nurses are particularly well situated to engage in a collaborative family-focused approach to the couple with cancer that promotes communication and health.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  couples; lung cancer; protective buffering; relationship quality; symptom incongruence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803239      PMCID: PMC5405735          DOI: 10.1177/1074840716675976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Nurs        ISSN: 1074-8407            Impact factor:   3.818


  55 in total

1.  Talking facilitates cognitive-emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor.

Authors:  S J Lepore; J D Ragan; S Jones
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain.

Authors:  P G Archbold; B J Stewart; M R Greenlick; T Harvath
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Barriers to mental health service use among distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  C E Mosher; B A Given; J S Ostroff
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 4.  Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information?

Authors:  C J McPherson; J M Addington-Hall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Deborah A Kashy
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-05-10

6.  Study of dyadic communication in couples managing prostate cancer: a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Laurel L Northouse; Lingling Zhang; Thomas M Braun; Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Darlene W Mood
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Physical health and depression: a dyadic study of chronic health conditions and depressive symptomatology in older adult couples.

Authors:  Brian J Ayotte; Frances M Yang; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Holding back, intimacy, and psychological and relationship outcomes among couples coping with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; David Kissane; Talia Zaider; Deborah Kashy; David Lee; Carolyn Heckman; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2015-07-20

9.  Psychosocial adjustment among cancer survivors: findings from a national survey of health and well-being.

Authors:  Erin S Costanzo; Carol D Ryff; Burton H Singer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain.

Authors:  San Keller; Carla M Bann; Sheri L Dodd; Jeff Schein; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  6 in total

1.  The dyadic relationship of benefit finding and its impact on quality of life in colorectal cancer survivor and spousal caregiver couples.

Authors:  Yi Lin; Xingjuan Luo; Jieyu Li; Yinghua Xu; Qiuping Li
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Caring experiences of family caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Yoonjoo Kim; Wonhee Baek
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Zachary M Kassir; Jinhong Li; Christine Harrison; Jonas T Johnson; Marci L Nilsen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Adapting a Theory-Informed Intervention to Help Young Adult Couples Cope With Reproductive and Sexual Concerns After Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica R Gorman; Karen S Lyons; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Chiara Acquati; Ellie Smith; Julia H Drizin; John M Salsman; Lisa M Flexner; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; S Marie Harvey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Active Engagement, Protective Buffering, and Depressive Symptoms in Young-Midlife Couples Surviving Cancer: The Roles of Age and Sex.

Authors:  Karen S Lyons; Jessica R Gorman; Brandon S Larkin; Grace Duncan; Brandon Hayes-Lattin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

6.  Factors Related to Family Caregivers' Readiness for the Hospital Discharge of Advanced Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ru-Yu Huang; Ting-Ting Lee; Yi-Hsien Lin; Chieh-Yu Liu; Hsiu-Chun Wu; Shu-He Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.