Juliet L Kroll1, Seokhun Kim2, Dalnim Cho3, Shiao-Pei Weathers4, Aileen B Chen5, Grace Smith3,5, Eduardo Bruera6, Kathrin Milbury2. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. jlkroll@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. 3. Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In efforts to understand financial distress (FD) associated with advanced cancer care from the perspective of both patients with incurable disease and their spousal caregivers, we assessed FD in both members of the couple, identified symptom and quality of life (QOL) correlates, and examined the potential role of illness communication. METHODS: Patients undergoing treatment for stage III/IV lung cancer or a grade III/IV primary brain tumor and their spousal caregivers (n = 76 dyads) completed measures of somatic and affective symptoms including FD, physical and mental QOL, and ease of engaging in illness communication. Patients and caregivers additionally rated their perception of each other's symptoms, including FD. RESULTS: FD was endorsed by both patients (any FD 62.7%; high FD 24%) and spousal caregivers (any FD 64.7%; high FD 32.3%). Self-reported FD was significantly correlated (partial r = .52, p < .001) within couples. FD was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety (r = .29, p = .01; r = .31, p = .01), depression (r = 29, p = 01; r = .39, p = .001), and poorer physical QOL(r = - .25, p = .03; r = - .25, p = .001) for patients and caregivers, respectively. For patients, FD was additionally associated with poorer mental QOL(r = - .44, p < .001). Caregivers accurately perceived patient FD, yet patients tended to underreport their caregiver's FD by almost an entire point (t = 2.8, p = .007). A 3-way interaction (FD X role X illness communication) revealed (b = .40, p = .041) that illness communication moderated the association between FD and physical QOL for spouses so that spouses who reported less ease of illness communication demonstrated a stronger association between financial distress and physical QOL (b = - 2.08, p < .001) than those reporting greater ease of engaging in illness communication (b = .49, p = .508). CONCLUSION: In the advanced cancer setting, FD is prevalent in both patients and their spousal caregivers and associated with psychological distress and poor physical QOL. Results suggest that optimal FD assessment should include patients and spouses, and spouse's ease of engaging with illness communication may be a potential target for future intervention studies.
PURPOSE: In efforts to understand financial distress (FD) associated with advanced cancer care from the perspective of both patients with incurable disease and their spousal caregivers, we assessed FD in both members of the couple, identified symptom and quality of life (QOL) correlates, and examined the potential role of illness communication. METHODS: Patients undergoing treatment for stage III/IV lung cancer or a grade III/IV primary brain tumor and their spousal caregivers (n = 76 dyads) completed measures of somatic and affective symptoms including FD, physical and mental QOL, and ease of engaging in illness communication. Patients and caregivers additionally rated their perception of each other's symptoms, including FD. RESULTS: FD was endorsed by both patients (any FD 62.7%; high FD 24%) and spousal caregivers (any FD 64.7%; high FD 32.3%). Self-reported FD was significantly correlated (partial r = .52, p < .001) within couples. FD was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety (r = .29, p = .01; r = .31, p = .01), depression (r = 29, p = 01; r = .39, p = .001), and poorer physical QOL(r = - .25, p = .03; r = - .25, p = .001) for patients and caregivers, respectively. For patients, FD was additionally associated with poorer mental QOL(r = - .44, p < .001). Caregivers accurately perceived patient FD, yet patients tended to underreport their caregiver's FD by almost an entire point (t = 2.8, p = .007). A 3-way interaction (FD X role X illness communication) revealed (b = .40, p = .041) that illness communication moderated the association between FD and physical QOL for spouses so that spouses who reported less ease of illness communication demonstrated a stronger association between financial distress and physical QOL (b = - 2.08, p < .001) than those reporting greater ease of engaging in illness communication (b = .49, p = .508). CONCLUSION: In the advanced cancer setting, FD is prevalent in both patients and their spousal caregivers and associated with psychological distress and poor physical QOL. Results suggest that optimal FD assessment should include patients and spouses, and spouse's ease of engaging with illness communication may be a potential target for future intervention studies.
Authors: Matthew M Clark; Teresa A Rummans; Jeff A Sloan; Andrus Jensen; Pamela J Atherton; Marlene H Frost; Jarrett W Richardson; J Michael Bostwick; Mary E Johnson; Jean M Hanson; Paul D Brown Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2006 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Khalil Baddour; Mark Fadel; Meng Zhao; Michael Corcoran; Maryanna S Owoc; Teresa H Thomas; Lindsay M Sabik; Marci L Nilsen; Robert L Ferris; Leila J Mady Journal: Head Neck Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.821
Authors: Stephanie B Wheeler; Caitlin B Biddell; Michelle L Manning; Mindy S Gellin; Neda R Padilla; Lisa P Spees; Cynthia D Rogers; Julia Rodriguez-O'Donnell; Cleo Samuel-Ryals; Sarah A Birken; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Victoria M Petermann; Allison M Deal; Donald L Rosenstein Journal: Trials Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 2.728