Literature DB >> 26183166

My Lived Experiences Are More Important Than Your Probabilities: The Role of Individualized Risk Estimates for Decision Making about Participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).

Christine Holmberg1, Erika A Waters2, Katie Whitehouse1, Mary Daly3, Worta McCaskill-Stevens4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision-making experts emphasize that understanding and using probabilistic information are important for making informed decisions about medical treatments involving complex risk-benefit tradeoffs. Yet empirical research demonstrates that individuals may not use probabilities when making decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To explore decision making and the use of probabilities for decision making from the perspective of women who were risk-eligible to enroll in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).
METHODS: We conducted narrative interviews with 20 women who agreed to participate in STAR and 20 women who declined. The project was based on a narrative approach. Analysis included the development of summaries of each narrative, and thematic analysis with developing a coding scheme inductively to code all transcripts to identify emerging themes.
RESULTS: Interviewees explained and embedded their STAR decisions within experiences encountered throughout their lives. Such lived experiences included but were not limited to breast cancer family history, a personal history of breast biopsies, and experiences or assumptions about taking tamoxifen or medicines more generally.
CONCLUSIONS: Women's explanations of their decisions about participating in a breast cancer chemoprevention trial were more complex than decision strategies that rely solely on a quantitative risk-benefit analysis of probabilities derived from populations In addition to precise risk information, clinicians and risk communicators should recognize the importance and legitimacy of lived experience in individual decision making.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer risk; chemoprevention; decision making; individualized risk information; lived experiences; narrative interviews

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183166      PMCID: PMC4592416          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15594382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  35 in total

1.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Use of tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer chemoprevention in 2010.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Worta McCaskill Stevens; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Statistical numeracy for health: a cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-08

4.  Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing breast cancer.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-04-19

7.  Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial: advancing the science of recruitment and breast cancer risk assessment in minority communities.

Authors:  Worta McCaskill-Stevens; John W Wilson; Elise D Cook; Cora L Edwards; Regina V Gibson; Diane L McElwain; Colmar D Figueroa-Moseley; Electra D Paskett; Noma L Roberson; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  The right tool is what they need, not what we have: a taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Norbert Hootsmans; Michael Neilson; Bethany Roy; Terence Kungel; Caitlin Gutheil; Michael Diefenbach; Moritz Hansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  22 in total

1.  Understanding Decision Making about Breast Cancer Prevention in Action: The Intersection of Perceived Risk, Perceived Control, and Social Context: NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Barbara G Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Tracy A Battaglia; Patricia A Parker; Angela Fagerlin; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Hanna Bandos; Sarah B Blakeslee; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Deciding on breast cancer risk reduction: The role of counseling in individual decision-making - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah B Blakeslee; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Patricia A Parker; Christine M Gunn; Hanna Bandos; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; Angela Fagerlin; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-06-27

Review 4.  Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Jennifer Bergstrom; Goli Samimi; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Spontaneous mental associations with the words "side effect": Implications for informed and shared decision making.

Authors:  Sonya Izadi; Thorsten Pachur; Courtney Wheeler; Jaclyn McGuire; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-05-24

6.  Exploring Explanatory Models of Risk in Breast Cancer Risk Counseling Discussions: NSABP/NRG Oncology Decision-Making Project 1.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Barbara Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Patricia A Parker; Sarah Blakeslee; Hanna Bandos; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Stephanie L Fowler; William M P Klein; Linda Ball; Jaclyn McGuire; Graham A Colditz; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  PARTICIPATORY BULLSEYE TOOLKIT INTERVIEW: IDENTIFYING PHYSICIANS' RELATIVE PRIORITIZATION OF DECISION FACTORS WHEN ORDERING RADIOLOGIC IMAGING IN A HOSPITAL SETTING.

Authors:  Michael F Rayo; Chandni Pawar; Elizabeth B-N Sanders; Beth W Liston; Emily S Patterson
Journal:  Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc       Date:  2018-06-29

9.  NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project-1 Results: Decision Making in Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Hanna Bandos; Angela Fagerlin; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; D Lawrence Wickerham; Worta J McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-10-04

10.  Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors.

Authors:  Goli Samimi; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Christine Holmberg; Bethany Tennant; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Kisha I Coa; Shelley S Kay; Leslie G Ford; Eva Szabo; Lori M Minasian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.