Christine Holmberg1, Erika A Waters2, Katie Whitehouse1, Mary Daly3, Worta McCaskill-Stevens4. 1. Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (CH, KW) 2. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA (EAW) 3. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA (MD) 4. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA (WM).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Decision-making experts emphasize that understanding and using probabilistic information are important for making informed decisions about medical treatments involving complex risk-benefit tradeoffs. Yet empirical research demonstrates that individuals may not use probabilities when making decisions. OBJECTIVES: To explore decision making and the use of probabilities for decision making from the perspective of women who were risk-eligible to enroll in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR). METHODS: We conducted narrative interviews with 20 women who agreed to participate in STAR and 20 women who declined. The project was based on a narrative approach. Analysis included the development of summaries of each narrative, and thematic analysis with developing a coding scheme inductively to code all transcripts to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Interviewees explained and embedded their STAR decisions within experiences encountered throughout their lives. Such lived experiences included but were not limited to breast cancer family history, a personal history of breast biopsies, and experiences or assumptions about taking tamoxifen or medicines more generally. CONCLUSIONS: Women's explanations of their decisions about participating in a breast cancer chemoprevention trial were more complex than decision strategies that rely solely on a quantitative risk-benefit analysis of probabilities derived from populations In addition to precise risk information, clinicians and risk communicators should recognize the importance and legitimacy of lived experience in individual decision making.
BACKGROUND: Decision-making experts emphasize that understanding and using probabilistic information are important for making informed decisions about medical treatments involving complex risk-benefit tradeoffs. Yet empirical research demonstrates that individuals may not use probabilities when making decisions. OBJECTIVES: To explore decision making and the use of probabilities for decision making from the perspective of women who were risk-eligible to enroll in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR). METHODS: We conducted narrative interviews with 20 women who agreed to participate in STAR and 20 women who declined. The project was based on a narrative approach. Analysis included the development of summaries of each narrative, and thematic analysis with developing a coding scheme inductively to code all transcripts to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Interviewees explained and embedded their STAR decisions within experiences encountered throughout their lives. Such lived experiences included but were not limited to breast cancer family history, a personal history of breast biopsies, and experiences or assumptions about taking tamoxifen or medicines more generally. CONCLUSIONS:Women's explanations of their decisions about participating in a breast cancer chemoprevention trial were more complex than decision strategies that rely solely on a quantitative risk-benefit analysis of probabilities derived from populations In addition to precise risk information, clinicians and risk communicators should recognize the importance and legitimacy of lived experience in individual decision making.
Authors: Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Worta McCaskill Stevens; Andrew N Freedman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Odette Wegwarth; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2010-04-19
Authors: Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Worta McCaskill-Stevens; John W Wilson; Elise D Cook; Cora L Edwards; Regina V Gibson; Diane L McElwain; Colmar D Figueroa-Moseley; Electra D Paskett; Noma L Roberson; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Paul K J Han; Norbert Hootsmans; Michael Neilson; Bethany Roy; Terence Kungel; Caitlin Gutheil; Michael Diefenbach; Moritz Hansen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christine M Gunn; Barbara G Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Tracy A Battaglia; Patricia A Parker; Angela Fagerlin; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Hanna Bandos; Sarah B Blakeslee; Christine Holmberg Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Sarah B Blakeslee; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Patricia A Parker; Christine M Gunn; Hanna Bandos; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; Angela Fagerlin; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christine Holmberg Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-06-27
Authors: Christine M Gunn; Barbara Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Patricia A Parker; Sarah Blakeslee; Hanna Bandos; Christine Holmberg Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2019 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Stephanie L Fowler; William M P Klein; Linda Ball; Jaclyn McGuire; Graham A Colditz; Erika A Waters Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Michael F Rayo; Chandni Pawar; Elizabeth B-N Sanders; Beth W Liston; Emily S Patterson Journal: Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc Date: 2018-06-29
Authors: Christine Holmberg; Hanna Bandos; Angela Fagerlin; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; D Lawrence Wickerham; Worta J McCaskill-Stevens Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2017-10-04
Authors: Goli Samimi; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Christine Holmberg; Bethany Tennant; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Kisha I Coa; Shelley S Kay; Leslie G Ford; Eva Szabo; Lori M Minasian Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 4.965