Literature DB >> 28363033

Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity.

Stephanie L Fowler1, William M P Klein1, Linda Ball2, Jaclyn McGuire2, Graham A Colditz2, Erika A Waters2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internet-based cancer risk assessment tools might serve as a strategy for translating epidemiological risk prediction research into public health practice. Understanding how such tools affect key social-cognitive precursors of behavior change is crucial for leveraging their potential into effective interventions.
PURPOSE: To test the effects of a publicly available, Internet-based, breast cancer risk assessment tool on social-cognitive precursors of physical activity.
METHODS: Women (N = 132) aged 40-78 with no personal cancer history indicated their perceived risk of breast cancer and were randomly assigned to receive personalized ( www.yourdiseaserisk.wustl.edu ) or nonpersonalized breast cancer risk information. Immediately thereafter, breast cancer risk perceptions and physical activity-related behavioral intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy were assessed.
RESULTS: Personalized information elicited higher intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy than nonpersonalized information, P values < 0.05. Self-efficacy and response efficacy mediated the effect of personalizing information on intentions. Women who received personalized information corrected their inaccurate risk perceptions to some extent, P values < 0.05, but few fully accepted the information.
CONCLUSION: Internet-based risk assessment tools can produce beneficial effects on important social-cognitive precursors of behavior change, but lingering skepticism, possibly due to defensive processing, needs to be addressed before the effects can be maximized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; health cognitions; health communication; risk perception; risk prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28363033      PMCID: PMC5498243          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17699835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  42 in total

1.  Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception.

Authors:  Karen M Emmons; Mei Wong; Elaine Puleo; Neil Weinstein; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

2.  Adherence to a daily flossing regimen in university students: effects of planning when, where, how and what to do in the face of barriers.

Authors:  Benjamin Schüz; Falko F Sniehotta; Amelie Wiedemann; Rainer Seemann
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 3.  The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paschal Sheeran; Alexander Maki; Erika Montanaro; Aya Avishai-Yitshak; Angela Bryan; William M P Klein; Eleanor Miles; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Effectiveness of personalized and interactive health risk calculators: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Julie S Downs; Rema Padman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability.

Authors:  Paul D Windschitl; René Martin; Annette R Flugstad
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-05

6.  Five-year and lifetime risk of breast cancer among U.S. subpopulations: implications for magnetic resonance imaging screening.

Authors:  Barry I Graubard; Andrew N Freedman; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Impact of personalized cardiovascular disease risk estimates on physical activity-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H C Price; S J Griffin; R R Holman
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Norbert Hootsmans; Michael Neilson; Bethany Roy; Terence Kungel; Caitlin Gutheil; Michael Diefenbach; Moritz Hansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities--United States, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  Participatory Design of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Behavioral Health.

Authors:  Alex T Ramsey; Michael Bray; Penina Acayo Laker; Jessica L Bourdon; Amelia Dorsey; Maia Zalik; Amanda Pietka; Patricia Salyer; Erika A Waters; Li-Shiun Chen; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-03-24

2.  Alcohol and breast cancer risk: Middle-aged women's logic and recommendations for reducing consumption in Australia.

Authors:  Samantha B Meyer; Kristen Foley; Ian Olver; Paul R Ward; Darlene McNaughton; Lillian Mwanri; Emma R Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jeremy L Foust; Laura D Scherer; Amy McQueen; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Commentary: 20 years online with "Your Disease Risk".

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Hank Dart
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Ashley J Housten; Jamie L Studts; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.