Sonya Izadi1, Thorsten Pachur2, Courtney Wheeler1, Jaclyn McGuire1, Erika A Waters3. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA. 2. Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA. Electronic address: waterse@wustl.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into patients' medical decisions by exploring the content of laypeople's spontaneous mental associations with the term "side effect." METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey asked 144 women aged 40-74, "What are the first three things you think of when you hear the words 'side effect?"' Data were analyzed using content analysis, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: 17 codes emerged and were grouped into 4 themes and a Miscellaneous category: Health Problems (70.8% of participants), Decision-Relevant Evaluations (52.8%), Negative Affect (30.6%), Practical Considerations (18.1%) and Miscellaneous (9.7%). The 4 most frequently identified codes were: Risk (36.1%), Health Problems-Specific Symptoms (35.4%), Health Problems-General Terms (32.6%), and Negative Affect-Strong (19.4%). Code and theme frequencies were generally similar across demographic groups (ps>0.05). CONCLUSION: The term "side effect" spontaneously elicited comments related to identifying health problems and expressing negative emotions. This might explain why the mere possibility of side effects triggers negative affect for people making medical decisions. Some respondents also mentioned decision-relevant evaluations and practical considerations in response to side effects. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Addressing commonly-held associations and acknowledging negative affects provoked by side effects are first steps healthcare providers can take towards improving informed and shared patient decision making.
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into patients' medical decisions by exploring the content of laypeople's spontaneous mental associations with the term "side effect." METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey asked 144 women aged 40-74, "What are the first three things you think of when you hear the words 'side effect?"' Data were analyzed using content analysis, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: 17 codes emerged and were grouped into 4 themes and a Miscellaneous category: Health Problems (70.8% of participants), Decision-Relevant Evaluations (52.8%), Negative Affect (30.6%), Practical Considerations (18.1%) and Miscellaneous (9.7%). The 4 most frequently identified codes were: Risk (36.1%), Health Problems-Specific Symptoms (35.4%), Health Problems-General Terms (32.6%), and Negative Affect-Strong (19.4%). Code and theme frequencies were generally similar across demographic groups (ps>0.05). CONCLUSION: The term "side effect" spontaneously elicited comments related to identifying health problems and expressing negative emotions. This might explain why the mere possibility of side effects triggers negative affect for people making medical decisions. Some respondents also mentioned decision-relevant evaluations and practical considerations in response to side effects. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Addressing commonly-held associations and acknowledging negative affects provoked by side effects are first steps healthcare providers can take towards improving informed and shared patient decision making.
Authors: James E Aikens; Donald E Nease; David P Nau; Michael S Klinkman; Thomas L Schwenk Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Benjamin R Bates; Alan Templeton; Paul J Achter; Tina M Harris; Celeste M Condit Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Sima L Sharara; Alicia I Arbaje; Sara E Cosgrove; Ayse P Gurses; Kathryn Dzintars; Nicholas Ladikos; Sarojini Sonjia Qasba; Sara C Keller Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Teresa García-García; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca; Carlos Jara; Carmen Beato; Beatriz Castelo; Montserrat Mangas; Eva Martínez de Castro; Avinash Ramchandani; David Gomez; Caterina Calderón Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.430