Literature DB >> 23335675

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial: advancing the science of recruitment and breast cancer risk assessment in minority communities.

Worta McCaskill-Stevens1, John W Wilson, Elise D Cook, Cora L Edwards, Regina V Gibson, Diane L McElwain, Colmar D Figueroa-Moseley, Electra D Paskett, Noma L Roberson, D Lawrence Wickerham, Norman Wolmark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the first chemoprevention trials conducted in the western hemisphere, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's (NSABP) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), demonstrated the need to evaluate all aspects of recruitment in real time and to implement strategies to enroll racial and ethnic minority women.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to review various patient recruitment efforts the NSABP developed to enhance the participation of racial and ethnic minority women in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) trial and to describe the role that the recruitment process played in the implementation and understanding of breast cancer risk assessment in minority communities.
METHODS: The NSABP STAR trial was a randomized, double-blinded study comparing the use of tamoxifen 20 mg/day to raloxifene 60 mg/day, for a 5-year period, to reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer. Eligible postmenopausal women were required to have a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk of 1.66% based on the modified Gail Model. For the current report, eligibility and enrollment data were tabulated by race/ethnicity for women who submitted STAR risk assessment forms (RAFs).
RESULTS: A total of 184,460 RAFs were received, 145,550 (78.9%) from white women and 38,910 (21.1%) from minority women. Of the latter group, 21,444 (11.6%) were from African Americans/blacks, 7913 (4.5%) from Hispanics/Latinas, and 9553 (5.2%) from other racial or ethnic groups. The percentages of risk-eligible women among African Americans, Hispanics/Latinas, others, and whites were 14.2%, 23.3%, 13.7%, and 57.4%, respectively. Programs targeting minority enrollment submitted large numbers of RAFs, but the eligibility rates of the women referred from those groups tended to be lower than the rates among women referred outside of those programs. The average number of completed risk assessments increased among minority women over the course of the recruitment period compared to those from whites. LIMITATIONS: We have not addressed all identified barriers to the recruitment of minorities in clinical research. Our risk assessments and recruitment results do not reflect the modified Gail Model for African Americans.
CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment strategies used in STAR for racial and ethnic minorities contributed to doubling the minority enrollment compared to that in the BCPT and increased the awareness of breast cancer risk assessment in minority communities. Incorporation of new information into models to improve the risk estimation of diverse populations should prove beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335675      PMCID: PMC4059676          DOI: 10.1177/1740774512470315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  14 in total

1.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Estimates of the number of US women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Barry I Graubard; Sowmya R Rao; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; J P Costantino; J Bryant; R Croyle; L Freedman; K Helzlsouer; V Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Stroke incidence and survival among middle-aged adults: 9-year follow-up of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort.

Authors:  W D Rosamond; A R Folsom; L E Chambless; C H Wang; P G McGovern; G Howard; L S Copper; E Shahar
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Barriers to minority participation in breast carcinoma prevention trials.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Judith S Jacobson; Andrea B Troxel; Dawn Hershman; Julie Karp; Christa Myers; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Black-white differences in stroke incidence in a national sample. The contribution of hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S J Kittner; L R White; K G Losonczy; P A Wolf; J R Hebel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Minority recruitment to the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT).

Authors:  Elise D Cook; Sarah Moody-Thomas; Karen B Anderson; Russell Campbell; Sandra J Hamilton; Joseph M Harrington; Scott M Lippman; Lori M Minasian; Electra D Paskett; Stephen Craine; Kathryn B Arnold; Jeffrey L Probstfield
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Breast cancer risk assessments comparing Gail and CARE models in African-American women.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Kepher H Makambi; Wayne A I Frederick; Melvin Gaskins; Robert L Dewitty; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study.

Authors:  B Fisher; J P Costantino; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; M Kavanah; W M Cronin; V Vogel; A Robidoux; N Dimitrov; J Atkins; M Daly; S Wieand; E Tan-Chiu; L Ford; N Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  13 in total

1.  Enrolling Minority and Underserved Populations in Cancer Clinical Research.

Authors:  Sherrie F Wallington; Chiranjeev Dash; Vanessa B Sheppard; Tawara D Goode; Bridget A Oppong; Everett E Dodson; Rhonda N Hamilton; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  My Lived Experiences Are More Important Than Your Probabilities: The Role of Individualized Risk Estimates for Decision Making about Participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Erika A Waters; Katie Whitehouse; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caren Heller; Joyce E Balls-Berry; Jill Dumbauld Nery; Patricia J Erwin; Dawn Littleton; Mimi Kim; Winston P Kuo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Strategies to Identify and Recruit Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer to a Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-based Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Julia E McGuinness; Gauri Bhatkhande; Jacquelyn Amenta; Thomas Silverman; Jennie Mata; Ashlee Guzman; Ting He; Jill Dimond; Tarsha Jones; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  The influence of health disparities on targeting cancer prevention efforts.

Authors:  Alan B Zonderman; Ngozi Ejiogu; Jennifer Norbeck; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Gaining control over breast cancer risk: Transforming vulnerability, uncertainty, and the future through clinical trial participation - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Katie Whitehouse; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03

7.  Retention of black and white participants in the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SWOG-coordinated intergroup study S0000).

Authors:  Kathryn B Arnold; John A Hermos; Karen B Anderson; Lori Minasian; Catherine M Tangen; Jeffrey F Probstfield; Elise D Cook
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Erin A Bowles; Sarah Knerr; Kathleen A Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-12

9.  Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Sarah T Hawley; Sue Stableford; Jamie L Studts; Margaret M Byrne
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Uptake of tamoxifen in consecutive premenopausal women under surveillance in a high-risk breast cancer clinic.

Authors:  L S Donnelly; D G Evans; J Wiseman; J Fox; R Greenhalgh; J Affen; I Juraskova; P Stavrinos; S Dawe; J Cuzick; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.