Literature DB >> 22523401

A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.

Ruth Rosenholtz1, Jie Huang, Alvin Raj, Benjamin J Balas, Livia Ilie.   

Abstract

Vision is an active process: We repeatedly move our eyes to seek out objects of interest and explore our environment. Visual search experiments capture aspects of this process, by having subjects look for a target within a background of distractors. Search speed often correlates with target-distractor discriminability; search is faster when the target and distractors look quite different. However, there are notable exceptions. A given discriminability can yield efficient searches (where the target seems to "pop-out") as well as inefficient ones (where additional distractors make search significantly slower and more difficult). Search is often more difficult when finding the target requires distinguishing a particular configuration or conjunction of features. Search asymmetries abound. These puzzling results have fueled three decades of theoretical and experimental studies. We argue that the key issue in search is the processing of image patches in the periphery, where visual representation is characterized by summary statistics computed over a sizable pooling region. By quantifying these statistics, we predict a set of classic search results, as well as peripheral discriminability of crowded patches such as those found in search displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22523401      PMCID: PMC4032502          DOI: 10.1167/12.4.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  43 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distractor heterogeneity, attention, and color in visual search.

Authors:  Allen L Nagy; Gina Thomas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Crowding with conjunctions of simple features.

Authors:  Endel Põder; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.

Authors:  Lavanya Reddy; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The influence of the retinal inhomogeneity on the perception of spatial patterns.

Authors:  A J van Doorn; J J Koenderink; M A Bouman
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1972-04

9.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search.

Authors:  W S Geisler; K L Chou
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search.

Authors:  R Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  53 in total

1.  Memory and learning with rapid audiovisual sequences.

Authors:  Arielle S Keller; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The binding problem lives on: comment on Di Lollo.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Image statistics underlying natural texture selectivity of neurons in macaque V4.

Authors:  Gouki Okazawa; Satohiro Tajima; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Cube search, revisited.

Authors:  Xuetao Zhang; Jie Huang; Serap Yigit-Elliott; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Contributions of ensemble perception to outlier representation precision.

Authors:  Burcu Avci; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Ensemble statistics accessed through proxies: Range heuristic and dependence on low-level properties in variability discrimination.

Authors:  Jonas Sin-Heng Lau; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Eye movements reveal distinct encoding patterns for number and cumulative surface area in random dot arrays.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.