Literature DB >> 23245914

A new methodological framework to interpret complex DNA profiles using likelihood ratios.

P Gill1, H Haned.   

Abstract

Although likelihood ratio (LR) based methods to analyse complex mixtures of two or more individuals, that exhibit the twin phenomena of drop-out and drop-in has been in the public domain for more than a decade, progress towards widespread implementation in to casework has been slow. The aim of this paper is to establish a LR-based framework using principles of the basic model recommended by the ISFG DNA commission. We use the tools in the form of open-source software (LRmix) in the Forensim package for the R software. A generalised set of guidelines has been prepared that can be used to evaluate any complex mixture. In addition, a validation framework has been proposed in order to evaluate LRs that are generated on a case-specific basis. This process is facilitated by replacing the reference profile of interest (typically the suspect's profile) with simulated random man using Monte-Carlo simulations and comparing the resulting distributions with the estimated LR. Validation is best carried out by comparison with a standard. Because LRmix is open-source we proposed that it is ideally positioned to be adopted as a standard basic model for complex DNA profile tests. This should not be confused with 'the best model' since it is clear that improvements could be made over time. Nevertheless, it is highly desirable to have a methodology in place that can show whether an improvement has been achieved should additional parameters, such as allele peak heights, are incorporated into the model. To facilitate comparative studies, we provide all of the necessary data for three test examples, presented as standard tests that can be utilised to carry out comparative studies. We envisage that the resource of standard test examples will be expanded over coming years so that a range of different case-types that are included will be used in order to improve the efficacy of models; to understand their advantages; conversely, to understand any limitations and to provide training material.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23245914     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  15 in total

1.  On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Torben Tvedebrink
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  The future of forensic DNA analysis.

Authors:  John M Butler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.

Authors:  Klaas-Jan Slooten; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Mitochondrial genome sequencing with short overlapping amplicons on MiSeq FGx system.

Authors:  Yang Xin; Rulin Jia; Suhua Zhang; Fei Guo
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.

Authors:  Harish Swaminathan; Muhammad O Qureshi; Catherine M Grgicak; Ken Duffy; Desmond S Lun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nothing but hot air?-On the molecular ballistic analysis of backspatter generated by and the hazard potential of blank guns.

Authors:  Jan Euteneuer; Annica Gosch; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Thore Egeland; Peter Gill
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles.

Authors:  Keith Inman; Norah Rudin; Ken Cheng; Chris Robinson; Adam Kirschner; Luke Inman-Semerau; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.

Authors:  Christopher D Steele; Matthew Greenhalgh; David J Balding
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.