Literature DB >> 26614310

Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.

Guro Dørum1, Daniel Kling2,3, Andreas Tillmar4,5, Magnus Dehli Vigeland6, Thore Egeland2.   

Abstract

Mixture DNA profiles commonly appear in forensic genetics, and a large number of statistical methods and software are available for such cases. However, most of the literature concerns mixtures where the contributors are assumed unrelated and the genetic markers are unlinked. In this paper, we consider mixtures of linked markers and related contributors. If no relationships are involved, linkage can be ignored. While unlinked markers can be treated independently, linkage introduces dependencies. The use of linked markers presents statistical and computational challenges, but may also lead to a considerable increase in power since the number of markers available is much larger if we do not require the markers to be unlinked. In addition, some cases that cannot be solved with an unlimited number of unlinked autosomal markers can be solved with linked markers. We focus on two special cases of linked markers: pairs of linked autosomal markers and X-chromosomal markers. A framework is presented for calculation of likelihood ratios for mixtures with general relationships and with linkage between any number of markers. Finally, we explore the effect of linkage disequilibrium, also called allelic association, on the likelihood ratio.

Keywords:  DNA mixtures; Forensics; Kinship; Likelihood ratio; Linkage; Linkage disequilibrium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614310     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1288-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of global variability in 15 established and 5 new European Standard Set (ESS) STRs using the CEPH human genome diversity panel.

Authors:  C Phillips; L Fernandez-Formoso; M Garcia-Magariños; L Porras; T Tvedebrink; J Amigo; M Fondevila; A Gomez-Tato; J Alvarez-Dios; A Freire-Aradas; A Gomez-Carballa; A Mosquera-Miguel; A Carracedo; M V Lareu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.882

2.  Collaborative genetic mapping of 12 forensic short tandem repeat (STR) loci on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  Michael Nothnagel; Reinhard Szibor; Oliver Vollrath; Christa Augustin; Jeanett Edelmann; Maria Geppert; Cíntia Alves; Leonor Gusmão; Marielle Vennemann; Yiping Hou; Uta-Dorothee Immel; Serena Inturri; Haibo Luo; Sabine Lutz-Bonengel; Carlo Robino; Lutz Roewer; Burkhard Rolf; Juliane Sanft; Kyoung-Jin Shin; Jeong Eun Sim; Peter Wiegand; Christian Winkler; Michael Krawczak; Sandra Hering
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.882

3.  Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis.

Authors:  Qiqing Huang; Sanjay Shete; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Discrimination of half-siblings when maternal genotypes are known.

Authors:  Lianne R Mayor; David J Balding
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future.

Authors:  Reinhard Szibor
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for eight X-STR markers.

Authors:  Andreas O Tillmar; Petter Mostad; Thore Egeland; Bertil Lindblom; Gunilla Holmlund; Kerstin Montelius
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives.

Authors:  Yue-Qing Hu; Wing K Fung
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Identification of distant family relationships.

Authors:  Øivind Skare; Nuala Sheehan; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.

Authors:  Klaas-Jan Slooten; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  FamLinkX - implementation of a general model for likelihood computations for X-chromosomal marker data.

Authors:  Daniel Kling; Barbara Dell'Amico; Andreas O Tillmar
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.882

View more
  1 in total

1.  The forensic value of X-linked markers in mixed-male DNA analysis.

Authors:  HaiJun He; Lagabaiyila Zha; JinHong Cai; Jian Huang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.