Literature DB >> 26158056

Noise properties and task-based evaluation of diffraction-enhanced imaging.

Jovan G Brankov1, Alejandro Saiz-Herranz1, Miles N Wernick1.   

Abstract

Diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI) is an emerging x-ray imaging method that simultaneously yields x-ray attenuation and refraction images and holds great promise for soft-tissue imaging. The DEI has been mainly studied using synchrotron sources, but efforts have been made to transition the technology to more practical implementations using conventional x-ray sources. The main technical challenge of this transition lies in the relatively lower x-ray flux obtained from conventional sources, leading to photon-limited data contaminated by Poisson noise. Several issues that must be understood in order to design and optimize DEI imaging systems with respect to noise performance are addressed. Specifically, we: (a) develop equations describing the noise properties of DEI images, (b) derive the conditions under which the DEI algorithm is statistically optimal, (c) characterize the imaging performance that can be obtained as measured by task-based metrics, and (d) consider image-processing steps that may be employed to mitigate noise effects.

Keywords:  analyzer-based imaging; diffraction-enhanced imaging; noise analysis; phase-sensitive imaging; synchrotron; x-ray

Year:  2014        PMID: 26158056      PMCID: PMC4478983          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.033503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  19 in total

1.  Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography.

Authors:  E D Pisano; R E Johnston; D Chapman; J Geradts; M V Iacocca; C A Livasy; D B Washburn; D E Sayers; Z Zhong; M Z Kiss; W C Thomlinson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Blood vessels: depiction at phase-contrast X-ray imaging without contrast agents in the mouse and rat-feasibility study.

Authors:  A Momose; T Takeda; Y Itai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Measurement of image contrast using diffraction enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Miklos Z Kiss; Dale E Sayers; Zhong Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Medical applications of synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  P Suortti; W Thomlinson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  X-ray phase, absorption and scatter retrieval using two or more phase contrast images.

Authors:  Marcus J Kitchen; David M Paganin; Kentaro Uesugi; Beth J Allison; Robert A Lewis; Stuart B Hooper; Konstantin M Pavlov
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Analyser-based phase contrast image reconstruction using geometrical optics.

Authors:  M J Kitchen; K M Pavlov; K K W Siu; R H Menk; G Tromba; R A Lewis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography.

Authors:  J A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

9.  The design and application of an in-laboratory diffraction-enhanced x-ray imaging instrument.

Authors:  Ivan Nesch; Daniel P Fogarty; Tochko Tzvetkov; Benjamin Reinhart; A Charles Walus; Gocha Khelashvili; Carol Muehleman; Dean Chapman
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.523

10.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.