Literature DB >> 26146446

Impact of Number of Repeated Scans on Model Observer Performance for a Low-contrast Detection Task in CT.

Chi Ma1, Lifeng Yu1, Baiyu Chen1, Thomas Vrieze1, Shuai Leng1, Cynthia McCollough1.   

Abstract

Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been validated against human observers for detection/classification tasks in clinical CT and shows encouraging correlations. However, the goodness of correlations depends on the number of repeated scans used in CHO to estimate the template and covariance matrices. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the number of repeated scans affects the CHO performance in predicting human observers. A phantom containing 21 low-contrast objects (3 contrast levels and 7 sizes) was scanned on a 128-slice CT scanner at three dose levels. Each scan was repeated 100 times. Images were reconstructed using a filtered-backprojection kernel and a commercial iterative reconstruction method. For each dose level and reconstruction setting, the low-contrast detectability, quantified with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (Az), was calculated using a previously validated CHO. To determine the dependency of CHO performance on the number of repeated scans, the Az value was calculated for each object and dose/reconstruction setting using all 100 repeated scans. The Az values were also calculated using randomly selected subsets of the scans (from 10 to 90 scans with an increment of 10 scans). Using the Az from the 100 scans as the reference, the accuracy of Az from a smaller number of scans was determined. The minimum necessary number of scans was subsequently derived. For the studied signal-known-exactly detection task, results demonstrated that, the minimal number of scans required to accurately predict human observer performance depends on dose level, object size and contrast level, and channel filters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO); Computed tomography (CT); Model observer; Radiation dose reduction; Task-based image quality assessment

Year:  2015        PMID: 26146446      PMCID: PMC4489414          DOI: 10.1117/12.2082836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  7 in total

1.  Effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions: a mathematical observer model analysis.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Ehsan Samei; Robert Saunders; Craig Abbey; David Delong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks.

Authors:  Miguel Eckstein; Jay Bartroff; Craig Abbey; James Whiting; Francois Bochud
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Model observers for assessment of image quality.

Authors:  H H Barrett; J Yao; J P Rolland; K J Myers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptive detection mechanisms in globally statistically nonstationary-oriented noise.

Authors:  Yani Zhang; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Correlation between human and model observer performance for discrimination task in CT.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Lingyun Chen; James M Kofler; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Rickey Carter; Alicia Y Toledano; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Predicting detection performance with model observers: Fourier domain or spatial domain?

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James Kofler; Christopher Favazza; Thomas Vrieze; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.