Literature DB >> 26141655

Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.

Sheri A Babb1, Elizabeth M Swisher, Hope N Heller, Alison J Whelan, David G Mutch, Thomas J Herzog, Janet S Rader.   

Abstract

Thirty women who had prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) and thirty women undergoing ovarian cancer surveillance (OCS) completed a one-time in-depth telephone interview exploring information gathering and decision-making processes. There were close similarities between groups, including age, race, marital status, education, menopausal status, number undergoing genetic testing for BRCA mutations, and number of prophylactic mastectomies. The majority of participants indicated overall satisfaction with their final decision. However, many described the information gathering process as frustrating and anxiety provoking. Participants in both groups expressed a need to process medical information within the context of individual psychosocial needs and personal perceptions and experiences. There were recurrent themes with regard to informational and psychosocial needs and personal perceptions and experiences that impacted decision-making process for these women. The present paper is a companion paper to Swisher et al. (J Repr Med 2001, 46:87-94) with the focus of this paper to illustrate the medical informational processing needs identified by this group of women.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 26141655     DOI: 10.1023/A:1014571420844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma, a phenotypic variant of familial ovarian cancer: implications for ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  B Y Karlan; R L Baldwin; E Lopez-Luevanos; L J Raffel; D Barbuto; S Narod; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer: reactions to initial assessment.

Authors:  G Erlick Robinson; B P Rosen; L N Bradley; W G Rockert; M L Carr; D E Cole; K J Murphy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Decision making about prophylactic oophorectomy among at-risk women: psychological influences and implications.

Authors:  S M Miller; C Y Fang; S L Manne; P F Engstrom; M B Daly
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Authors:  J Audrain; M D Schwartz; C Lerman; C Hughes; B N Peshkin; B Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

7.  A quantitative assessment of oral contraceptive use and risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S E Hankinson; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; T L Spencer; B Rosner; M J Stampfer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Characteristics of familial ovarian cancer: a report of the first 1,000 families in the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry.

Authors:  M S Piver; J M Goldberg; Y Tsukada; C J Mettlin; M F Jishi; N Natarajan
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 0.196

Review 9.  NIH consensus conference. Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  'You don't want to lose your ovaries because you think 'I might become a man". Women's perceptions of prophylactic surgery as a cancer risk management option.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  11 in total

1.  Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Disclosure of Positive BRCA1/2-Mutation Status in Young Couples: The Journey From Uncertainty to Bonding Through Partner Support.

Authors:  Lindsey M Hoskins; Kevin Roy; June A Peters; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kate J Lifford; Alison Clements; Lindsay Fraser; Deborah Lancastle; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Cancer Anxiety Mediates the Association Between Satisfaction With Medical Communication and Psychological Quality of Life After Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cristina Zarbo; Agostino Brugnera; Luigi Frigerio; Chiara Celi; Angelo Compare; Valentina Dessì; Rosalba Giordano; Chiara Malandrino; Federica Paola Sina; Maria Grazia Strepparava; Isadora Vaglio Tessitore; Mariangela Ventura; Robert Fruscio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  A unique service: how an embedded psychology team can help patients and genetics clinicians within a clinical genetics service.

Authors:  Clare Firth; Vishakha Tripathi; Alicja Kowalski Bellamy; Nadia Somers; Caroline Roos; Charlotte Tomlinson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.351

6.  An in-depth exploration of the post-test informational needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia.

Authors:  Jeanette Yuen; Si Ming Fung; Chin Leong Sia; Mallika Venkatramani; Tarryn Shaw; Eliza Courtney; Shao-Tzu Li; Jianbang Chiang; Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan; Benita Kiat-Tee Tan; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Life experiences of individuals with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and disclosing outside the family: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Leigh Ann Higa; Jamie McDonald; Deborah O Himes; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-09-04

9.  Women's constructions of the 'right time' to consider decisions about risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing oophorectomy.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Joan L Bottorff; Lynda G Balneaves; Charmaine Kim-Sing
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Uptake and timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Comfort N Ibe; James J Dignam; Shelly A Cummings; Marion Verp; Melody A White; Grazia Artioli; Laura Dudlicek; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.