Literature DB >> 1407899

A quantitative assessment of oral contraceptive use and risk of ovarian cancer.

S E Hankinson1, G A Colditz, D J Hunter, T L Spencer, B Rosner, M J Stampfer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a quantitative assessment of the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and ovarian cancer using results from the published literature. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a MEDLINE literature search for all epidemiologic studies of OC and ovarian cancer published in English between 1970-1991. The reference list for each article was reviewed to locate additional published articles. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included 20 studies in which a relative risk and either a standard error, confidence interval, or P value was reported, or sufficient data were presented to allow us to calculate these measures. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarized the findings using weighted averages and regression analyses. We found a summary relative risk of 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.73) associated with ever-use of OC, indicating a 36% reduction in ovarian cancer risk. The risk of ovarian cancer decreased with increasing duration of OC use; we noted a 10-12% decrease in risk with 1 year of use and approximately a 50% decrease after 5 years of use. The reduced risk was present among both nulliparous and parous women and it appeared to last for at least 10 years after cessation of use. Although most studies assessed the use of cessation of use. Although most studies assessed the use of OC formulations from the 1960s and 1970s, data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study indicate that the decreased ovarian cancer risk may also be present with current lower-dose formulations.
CONCLUSION: The protective effect of OC against ovarian cancer risk should be considered in a woman's decision to use OC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1407899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  20 in total

Review 1.  Forth nightly review: hereditary ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  L Kasprzak; W D Foulkes; A N Shelling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

2.  Role of conventional ovarian screening is questioned.

Authors:  G Narayansingh; K Chew; D Parkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-27

Review 3.  Progesterone action in breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Caroline H Diep; Andrea R Daniel; Laura J Mauro; Todd P Knutson; Carol A Lange
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.098

4.  A comparative study of the turnover of multiciliated cells in the mouse trachea, oviduct, and brain.

Authors:  Elle C Roberson; Ngan K Tran; Mia J Konjikusic; Rebecca D Fitch; Ryan S Gray; John B Wallingford
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Sheri A Babb; Elizabeth M Swisher; Hope N Heller; Alison J Whelan; David G Mutch; Thomas J Herzog; Janet S Rader
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Fallopian tube initiation of high grade serous ovarian cancer and ovarian metastasis: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Tova M Bergsten; Joanna E Burdette; Matthew Dean
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Breast-feeding the last born child and risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Judy R Rees; Kathryn L Terry; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Genetic variation in the one-carbon transfer pathway and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Thomas A Sellers; Joellen M Schildkraut; Julie M Cunningham; Robert A Vierkant; V Shane Pankratz; Zachary S Fredericksen; Madhura K Gadre; David N Rider; Mark Liebow; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Current understanding of risk factors for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Thanasak Sueblinvong; Michael E Carney
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15

10.  Active FOXO1 Is a Key Determinant of Isoform-Specific Progesterone Receptor Transactivation and Senescence Programming.

Authors:  Caroline H Diep; Todd P Knutson; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.