Literature DB >> 30962500

Evaluation of telephone genetic counselling to facilitate germline BRCA1/2 testing in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Erin Tutty1, Lara Petelin1,2, Joanne McKinley1, Mary-Anne Young3, Bettina Meiser4, Victoria M Rasmussen1, Rowan Forbes Shepherd1,2, Paul A James1,2, Laura E Forrest5,6.   

Abstract

Systemic healthcare issues and geographical challenges restrict women's access to BRCA1/2 testing to inform the use of tailored treatments for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Consequently, BRCA1/2 testing in this population is low and improved testing pathways are urgently needed. This study aimed to determine the acceptability and feasibility of telephone genetic counselling (TGC) to facilitate treatment-focused BRCA1/2 testing in Australia for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Women who received TGC were invited to complete a survey examining their experiences of the service. A cost analysis was conducted to compare the service to standard, in-person genetic counselling. One hundred and seven women responded (48% response rate); 8 had a BRCA1/2 variant affecting function. Geographical barriers prevented women from accessing genetic services in the past. All participants had a positive attitude towards testing, and regret following testing was minimal. While the impact of testing was greater for those with a positive test result, overall, genetic testing did not put the additional psychosocial burden on the participants. Participant's evaluations of the telephone interactions with the genetic counsellors were highly satisfactory. The service was also found to be cost-effective. This model of telephone genetic counselling was an acceptable and effective way to reduce barriers to BRCA1/2 testing for women with ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30962500      PMCID: PMC6777607          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  28 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties.

Authors:  Eva C Sundin; Mardi J Horowitz
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Karin M Butler; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kenneth M Boucher; Lisa M Pappas; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Sandra L Edwards; Antoinette M Stroup; Saundra S Buys; Kristina G Flores; Rebecca A Campo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Richard Gonzalez; Kara J Milliron; Victor J Strecher; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Scott Kelly; Rachel H Nusbaum; Morgan Similuk; Tiffani A DeMarco; Gillian W Hooker; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea D Forman; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Claire Davis; Shelley R McCormick; Wendy McKinnon; Kristi D Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Judy Garber; Marie Wood; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Disparities in uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a randomized trial of telephone counseling.

Authors:  Morgan Butrick; Scott Kelly; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Rachel Nusbaum; Gillian W Hooker; Kristi Graves; Lisa Feeley; Claudine Isaacs; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lina Jandorf; Tiffani DeMarco; Marie Wood; Wendy McKinnon; Judy Garber; Shelley R McCormick; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  New paradigms for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in women with ovarian cancer: results of the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study.

Authors:  Inga Plaskocinska; Hannah Shipman; James Drummond; Edward Thompson; Vanessa Buchanan; Barbara Newcombe; Charlotte Hodgkin; Elisa Barter; Paul Ridley; Rita Ng; Suzanne Miller; Adela Dann; Victoria Licence; Hayley Webb; Li Tee Tan; Margaret Daly; Sarah Ayers; Barnaby Rufford; Helena Earl; Christine Parkinson; Timothy Duncan; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Gurdeep S Sagoo; Stephen Abbs; Nicholas Hulbert-Williams; Paul Pharoah; Robin Crawford; James D Brenton; Marc Tischkowitz
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 10.  Finding all BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers: best practice models.

Authors:  Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Marjolijn Cj Jongmans
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schienda; Jill Stopfer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

2.  Patients' and professionals' perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Adrià López-Fernández; Guillermo Villacampa; Elia Grau; Mónica Salinas; Esther Darder; Estela Carrasco; Sara Torres-Esquius; Silvia Iglesias; Ares Solanes; Neus Gadea; Angela Velasco; Gisela Urgell; Maite Torres; Noemí Tuset; Joan Brunet; Sergi Corbella; Judith Balmaña
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 4.  Genetic Evaluation for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among African Americans: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Ambreen Khan; Charles R Rogers; Carson D Kennedy; AnaMaria Lopez; Joanne Jeter
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer patients: early experiences from the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Catherine Beard; Katrina Monohan; Linda Cicciarelli; Paul A James
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.351

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.