Literature DB >> 15131407

Delivering information about cancer genetics via letter to patients at low and moderate risk of familial cancer: a pilot study in Wales.

C Phelps1, K Platt, L France, J Gray, R Iredale.   

Abstract

Increasing demands upon specialist cancer genetics services have resulted in a need to explore alternative means of delivering genetic risk information to individuals at low-risk of familial cancer. This pilot study investigates patient satisfaction with a letter to low and moderate risk individuals notifying them of their risk. Sixty-six people completed a questionnaire designed to measure satisfaction with the way they had been notified of their cancer risk. Two key findings emerge from the data: first of all, whilst many respondents indicated overall satisfaction with the risk letter, a substantial number wanted more information about their risk; and secondly, low-risk individuals in this study are less reassured by and less satisfied with the risk letter than those at moderate risk. The optimal service provision for delivery of genetic risk information is likely to be one which can best respond to individual differences in information-seeking, distress and risk comprehension. There is a need therefore, for a randomised control trial to compare the effectiveness of a risk notification letter with more traditional telephone risk counselling and the implications of each mode of delivery upon the resources of specialist cancer genetics services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131407     DOI: 10.1023/B:FAME.0000026838.92085.ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  16 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services.

Authors:  J Emery; E Watson; P Rose; A Andermann
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  K Nordin; A Lidén; M Hansson; R Rosenquist; G Berglund
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Early Experience with a Web-based Intervention to Inform Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Abi Ludwig; Nigel Bush; Heidi K Unruh; Hendrika Meischke; Jean A Wooldridge; Robert Robbins
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2003-01

5.  Reducing Psychological Distress in a Genetic Counseling Consultation for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vlatka Duric; Phyllis Butow; Louise Sharpe; Elizabeth Lobb; Bettina Meiser; Alexandra Barratt; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

Authors:  M Watson; V Duvivier; M Wade Walsh; S Ashley; J Davidson; M Papaikonomou; V Murday; N Sacks; R Eeles
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor.

Authors:  M J Green; A M McInerney; B B Biesecker; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

8.  Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer.

Authors:  K Brain; J Gray; P Norman; E France; C Anglim; G Barton; E Parsons; A Clarke; H Sweetland; M Tischkowitz; J Myring; K Stansfield; D Webster; K Gower-Thomas; R Daoud; C Gateley; I Monypenny; H Singhal; L Branston; J Sampson; E Roberts; R Newcombe; D Cohen; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The information and support needs of women at high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer: how can cancer genetic services give patients what they want?

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Kate Brain; Jonathon Gray; Elizabeth France
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations.

Authors:  J Weinman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  8 in total

1.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Decision aids for familial breast cancer: exploring women's views using focus groups.

Authors:  Frances Rapport; Rachel Iredale; Wendy Jones; Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Jonathon Gray; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Julie Werrett; Sandra Van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Cyril Chapman; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-08-18

4.  Successful use of peer educators for sharing genetic information.

Authors:  Vickie L Venne; Heidi A Hamann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "I wouldn't classify myself as a patient": the importance of a "well-being" environment for individuals receiving counseling about familial cancer risk.

Authors:  Ceri Phelps; Debra Horrigan; Liwsi Kim Protheroe; Janina Hopkin; Wendy Jones; Alexandra Murray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

7.  Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards; Rachel Iredale; Peter Davies; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  "Who Doesn't Like Receiving Good News?" Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail.

Authors:  Annika T Beck; Erica J Sutton; Carolyn P Y Chow; Susan H Curtis; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.