Literature DB >> 2613740

Wear analysis of retrieved alumina heads and sockets of hip prostheses.

J M Dorlot1, P Christel, A Meunier.   

Abstract

The wear behavior of hip prostheses alumina components was studied on 20 retrieved implants removed for socket loosening. The observed wear takes two forms: a running-in of the mating surfaces and a gross disruption of the surfaces. The running-in is very shallow, in the order of 0.2 micron after 8 years of implantation. This is observed on the load-bearing areas of the components. Gross wear is not material-related but had always been associated to a high contact pressure between the edge of the socket and the femoral head. Such a high contact pressure occurs after the socket had loosened and then tilted or if it was initially positioned too vertically. The long-term success of alumina-alumina THP components depends essentially upon biomechanical considerations and upon the quality of the material. The area of contact between the head and the socket should be large enough to minimize the contact stresses. This can only be achieved by a good positioning of the socket and by a close tolerance fit of the alumina components; any deviation from sphericity should also be avoided. The normal wear behavior of alumina is a running-in process leading to an average wear rate of 0.025 micron/year as compared to 100 microns/year for UHMWPE on metallic heads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2613740     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820231405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  14 in total

1.  A squeaky reputation: the problem may be design-dependent.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Bahar Adeli; Justin C Wong; Camilo Restrepo; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T D Tennent; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

4.  The 2009 Frank Stinchfield Award: "Hip squeaking": a biomechanical study of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Christophe Chevillotte; Robert T Trousdale; Qingshan Chen; Olivier Guyen; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Hip replacement in the athlete: is there a role?

Authors:  M J Wilson; R N Villar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Mediators of the inflammatory response to joint replacement devices.

Authors:  Neil Cobelli; Brian Scharf; Giovanna M Crisi; John Hardin; Laura Santambrogio
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  Factors affecting modular acetabular ceramic liner insertion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  James P McAuley; Douglas A Dennis; Justin Grostefon; William G Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Alumina inlay failure in cemented polyethylene-backed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kentaro Iwakiri; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Yukihide Minoda; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Risk of impingement and third-body abrasion with 28-mm metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  Ian C Clarke; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Adrien Brusson; Christina Savisaar; John G Bowsher; Michelle Burgett; Thomas K Donaldson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial.

Authors:  William G Hamilton; James P McAuley; Douglas A Dennis; Jeffrey A Murphy; Thomas J Blumenfeld; Joel Politi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.