Literature DB >> 26135815

Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic.

Brian J Linder1, Marcelino E Rivera1, Matthew J Ziegelmann1, Daniel S Elliott2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term device outcomes following primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1802 male patients with stress urinary incontinence that underwent AUS placement from 1983 to 2011. Of these, 1082 (60%) were involving primary implantations and comprise the study cohort. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, defined as any secondary surgery. Patient follow-up was obtained through office examination, operative report, and written or telephone correspondence.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing AUS implantation had a median age of 71 years (interquartile range 66-76) and median follow-up of 4.1 years (interquartile range 0.8-7.7). Overall, 338 of 1082 patients (31.2%) underwent secondary surgery, including 89 for device infection and/or erosion, 131 for device malfunction, 89 for urethral atrophy, and 29 for pump malposition or tubing complications. No patient-related risk factors were independently associated with an increased risk of secondary surgery on multivariable analysis. Secondary surgery-free survival was 90% at 1 year, 74% at 5 years, 57% at 10 years, and 41% at 15 years.
CONCLUSION: Primary AUS implantation is associated with acceptable long-term outcomes. Recognition of long-term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26135815     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  32 in total

Review 1.  Reconstructive Management Options of Delayed Complications Following Bladder Outlet Surgery.

Authors:  Nora Baker; Carmen Tong; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Effects of Smoking Status on Device Survival Among Individuals Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

Authors:  Christina A Godwin; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-05-29

Review 3.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The impact of prior urethral sling on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Boyd R Viers; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Sandra Mühlstädt; Alexander Friedl; Nasreldin Mohammed; André Schumann; Karl Weigand; Felix Kawan; Christian Göllert; Christin Kahlert; Gerit Theil; Kersten Fischer; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Nicolas M Ortiz; Benjamin M Dropkin; Gregory A Joice; Adam S Baumgarten; Allen F Morey; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani; Stênio de Cássio Zequi; Walter Henriques da Costa; Bruno Santos Benigno; Rodrigo Sousa Madeira Campos; Wilson Bachega; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Risk factors for subsequent urethral atrophy in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; Brian J Linder; Boyd R Viers; Laureano J Rangel; Marcelino E Rivera; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-26

9.  Artificial urinary sphincter revision with Quick Connects® versus suture-tie connectors: does technique make a difference?

Authors:  Jack R Andrews; Brian J Linder; Joseph A Scales; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-26

10.  Evaluating the Role of Postoperative Oral Antibiotic Administration in Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Explantation: A Nationwide Analysis.

Authors:  Melanie A Adamsky; William R Boysen; Andrew J Cohen; Sandra Ham; Roger R Dmochowski; Sarah F Faris; Gregory T Bales; Joshua A Cohn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.