Literature DB >> 33779844

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach.

Roger K Khouri1, Nicolas M Ortiz2, Benjamin M Dropkin1, Gregory A Joice1, Adam S Baumgarten3, Allen F Morey1, Steven J Hudak4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review risk factors for AUS complications and present a systematic approach to their diagnosis and management. RECENT
FINDINGS: Established risk factors for AUS complications include catheterization, channel TURP, pelvic radiation, urethroplasty, anticoagulation, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, frailty index, hypertension, low albumin, and low testosterone. We present our algorithm for diagnosis and management of AUS complications. Despite being the gold standard of treatment for men with SUI, major and minor complications can occur at any point after AUS insertion. Careful consideration of the urologic, medical, and operative risk factors for each patient can help prevent complications. A systematic approach to early and late complications facilitates their identification and effective management. The evaluating urologist must have a thorough understanding of potential AUS complications in order to restore quality of life in men with bothersome SUI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial urinary sphincter; Men’s health; Reconstructive urology; Stress urinary incontinence; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33779844     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01045-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  98 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Manuela Tutolo; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Ricarda M Bauer; Sascha Ahyai; Giorgio Bozzini; John Heesakkers; Marcus J Drake; Kari A O Tikkinen; Ene Launonen; Stéphane Larré; Nikesh Thiruchelvam; Richard Lee; Philip Li; Michele Favro; Emanuele Zaffuto; Alexander Bachmann; Juan I Martinez-Salamanca; Thomas Pichon; Cosimo De Nunzio; Enrico Ammirati; Francois Haab; Frank Van Der Aa
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  The Impact of Prior Radiation Therapy on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Device Survival.

Authors:  Marcelino E Rivera; Brian J Linder; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Boyd R Viers; Laureano J Rangel; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kaiho; Hitoshi Masuda; Mineo Takei; Takahiro Hirayama; Takahiko Mitsui; Minato Yokoyama; Takeya Kitta; Naoki Kawamorita; Haruo Nakagawa; Masatsugu Iwamura; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; Benjamin Breyer; Craig Comiter; James A Eastham; Christopher Gomez; Daniel J Kirages; Chris Kittle; Alvaro Lucioni; Victor W Nitti; John T Stoffel; O Lenaine Westney; M Hassan Murad; Kurt McCammon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in adult men: Report from the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence.

Authors:  Marcio A Averbeck; Christopher Woodhouse; Craig Comiter; Homero Bruschini; Thomas Hanus; Sender Herschorn; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Carlo Gandi; Filippo Marino; Angelo Totaro; Luca Di Gianfrancesco; Giuseppe Palermo; Francesco Pierconti; Marco Racioppi; Pierfrancesco Bassi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes among Primary and Secondary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantations in Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Laureano J Rangel; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Evaluating Success Rates After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: A Comparison of Clinical Definitions.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Laureano J Rangel; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Multicenter Analysis of Patient Reported Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Jonathan T Wingate; Bradley A Erickson; Gregory Murphy; Thomas G Smith; Benjamin N Breyer; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term device survival and quality of life outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement.

Authors:  Timothy C Boswell; Daniel S Elliott; Laureano J Rangel; Brian J Linder
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion.

Authors:  Linley Diao; Samantha W Nealon; Gianpaolo P Carpinito; Shervin Badkhshan; Avery R Wolfe; Benjamin M Dropkin; Sarah C Sanders; Steven J Hudak; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.