Literature DB >> 26130486

Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to improve family communication.

Jan Hodgson1,2, Sylvia Metcalfe1,2, Clara Gaff2,3,4, Susan Donath2,5, Martin B Delatycki6,7, Ingrid Winship4,8, Loane Skene9, MaryAnne Aitken3,10, Jane Halliday2,11.   

Abstract

When an inherited genetic condition is diagnosed in an individual it has implications for other family members. Privacy legislation and ethical considerations can restrict health professionals from communicating directly with other family members, and so it is frequently the responsibility of the first person in a family to receive the diagnosis (the proband) to share this news. Communication of genetic information is challenging and many at-risk family members remain unaware of important information that may be relevant to their or their children's health. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in six public hospitals to assess whether a specifically designed telephone counselling intervention improved family communication about a new genetic diagnosis. Ninety-five probands/parents of probands were recruited from genetics clinics and randomised to the intervention or control group. The primary outcome measure was the difference between the proportion of at-risk relatives who contacted genetics services for information and/or genetic testing. Audit of the family genetic file after 18 months revealed that 25.6% of intervention group relatives compared with 20.9% of control group relatives made contact with genetic services (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.70-2.42, P=0.40). Although no major difference was detected overall between the intervention and control groups, there was more contact in the intervention group where the genetic condition conferred a high risk to offspring (adjusted OR 24.0, 95% confidence interval 3.4-168.5, P=0.001). The increasing sophistication and scope of genetic testing makes it imperative for health professionals to consider additional ways of supporting families in communicating genetic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130486      PMCID: PMC4755371          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of genetic services with and without genetic registers: access and attitudes to genetic counselling services among relatives of genetic clinic patients.

Authors:  L Kerzin-Storrar; C Wright; P R Williamson; A Fryer; A Njindou; O Quarrell; D Donnai; D Craufurd
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?

Authors:  Penelope Hawe; Alan Shiell; Therese Riley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-26

Review 3.  Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known.

Authors:  Brenda J Wilson; Karen Forrest; Edwin R van Teijlingen; Lorna McKee; Neva Haites; Eric Matthews; Sheila A Simpson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

4.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Martin B Delatycki; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Eric Legius
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  A genetic counseling intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited conditions.

Authors:  Clara Gaff; Jan Hodgson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic uptake in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients.

Authors:  Karin Landsbergen; Chris Verhaak; Floor Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Jo Burke; Sonya Bacic; David J Amor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Improving family communication after a new genetic diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial of a genetic counselling intervention.

Authors:  Jan M Hodgson; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Maryanne Aitken; Susan M Donath; Clara L Gaff; Ingrid M Winship; Martin B Delatycki; Loane L C Skene; Belinda J McClaren; Jean L Paul; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  24 in total

1.  The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Fred H Menko; Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Lizet E van der Kolk; Kiki N Jeanson; Winnie Schats; Daoud Ait Moha; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.

Authors:  Emily M Hinchcliff; Erica M Bednar; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Deborah K Gibbons; Wendy C Birmingham; Renea L Beckstrand; Amanda Gammon; Anita Y Kinney; Margaret F Clayton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A Relational Approach to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rowan Forbes Shepherd; Tamara Kayali Browne; Linda Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Parents' perspectives, experiences, and need for support when communicating with their children about the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS).

Authors:  Courtney B Cook; Caitlin Slomp; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-11-16

8.  Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Haley A Moss; Catherine H Watson; Diana L Urbauer; Alexander Melamed; Karen H Lu; Steven M Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Family genetic result communication in rare and undiagnosed disease communities: Understanding the practice.

Authors:  Courtney M Studwell; Emily G Kelley; Janet S Sinsheimer; Christina G S Palmer; Kimberly LeBlanc
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Development of a Secure Website to Facilitate Information Sharing in Families at High Risk of Bowel Cancer-The Familyweb Study.

Authors:  Selina Goodman; Heather Skirton; Leigh Jackson; Ray B Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.