Literature DB >> 26113296

Simulation studies of circular muscle contraction, longitudinal muscle shortening, and their coordination in esophageal transport.

Wenjun Kou1, John E Pandolfino2, Peter J Kahrilas2, Neelesh A Patankar3.   

Abstract

On the basis of a fully coupled active musculomechanical model for esophageal transport, we aimed to find the roles of circular muscle (CM) contraction and longitudinal muscle (LM) shortening in esophageal transport, and the influence of their coordination. Two groups of studies were conducted using a computational model. In the first group, bolus transport with only CM contraction, only LM shortening, or both was simulated. Overall features and detailed information on pressure and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of mucosal and the two muscle layers were analyzed. In the second group, bolus transport with varying delay in CM contraction or LM shortening was simulated. The effect of delay on esophageal transport was studied. For cases showing abnormal transport, pressure and CSA were further analyzed. CM contraction by itself was sufficient to transport bolus, but LM shortening by itself was not. CM contraction decreased the CSA and the radius of the muscle layer locally, but LM shortening increased the CSA. Synchronized CM contraction and LM shortening led to overlapping of muscle CSA and pressure peaks. Advancing LM shortening adversely influenced bolus transport, whereas lagging LM shortening was irrelevant to bolus transport. In conclusion, CM contraction generates high squeezing pressure, which plays a primary role in esophageal transport. LM shortening increases muscle CSA, which helps to strengthen CM contraction. Advancing LM shortening decreases esophageal distensibility in the bolus region. Lagging LM shortening no longer helps esophageal transport. Synchronized CM contraction and LM shortening seems to be most effective for esophageal transport.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circular muscle contraction; coordination of muscle activation; esophageal transport; longitudinal muscle shortening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26113296      PMCID: PMC4537927          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00058.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  25 in total

1.  Local longitudinal muscle shortening of the human esophagus from high-frequency ultrasonography.

Authors:  M A Nicosia; J G Brasseur; J B Liu; L S Miller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Shear modulus of elasticity of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Donghua Liao; Jingbo Zhao; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Synchrony between circular and longitudinal muscle contractions during peristalsis in normal subjects.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Bikram Padda; Vikas Bhalla; Valmik Bhargava; Jianmin Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Resolving the three-dimensional myoarchitecture of bovine esophageal wall with diffusion spectrum imaging and tractography.

Authors:  Richard J Gilbert; Terry A Gaige; Ruopeng Wang; Thomas Benner; Guangping Dai; Jonathan N Glickman; Van J Wedeen
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Biomechanical behaviour of oesophageal tissues: material and structural configuration, experimental data and constitutive analysis.

Authors:  Arturo N Natali; Emanuele L Carniel; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Biomechanical and histological characteristics of passive esophagus: experimental investigation and comparative constitutive modeling.

Authors:  Eleni A Stavropoulou; Yannis F Dafalias; Dimitrios P Sokolis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Analyses of normal and abnormal esophageal transport using computer simulations.

Authors:  M Li; J G Brasseur; W J Dodds
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-04

8.  Asynchrony between the circular and the longitudinal muscle contraction in patients with nutcracker esophagus.

Authors:  Hwoon-Yong Jung; James L Puckett; Vikas Bhalla; Maria Rojas-Feria; Valmik Bhargava; Jianmin Liu; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; W J Dodds; P J Kahrilas; J G Brasseur; I J Cook; I M Lang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-05

10.  Liquid in the gastroesophageal segment promotes reflux, but compliance does not: a mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.052

View more
  8 in total

1.  A continuum mechanics-based musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Boyce E Griffith; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Regulation and dysregulation of esophageal peristalsis by the integrated function of circular and longitudinal muscle layers in health and disease.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Simulation studies of the role of esophageal mucosa in bolus transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-01-03

4.  Could the peristaltic transition zone be caused by non-uniform esophageal muscle fiber architecture? A simulation study.

Authors:  W Kou; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas; N A Patankar
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Normative values of intra-bolus pressure and esophageal compliance based on 4D high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.960

6.  Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 18.511

7.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Four-dimensional impedance manometry derived from esophageal high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel analysis paradigm.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Neelesh A Patankar; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.409

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.