Literature DB >> 28054418

Could the peristaltic transition zone be caused by non-uniform esophageal muscle fiber architecture? A simulation study.

W Kou1, J E Pandolfino2, P J Kahrilas2, N A Patankar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on a fully coupled computational model of esophageal transport, we analyzed how varied esophageal muscle fiber architecture and/or dual contraction waves (CWs) affect bolus transport. Specifically, we studied the luminal pressure profile in those cases to better understand possible origins of the peristaltic transition zone.
METHODS: Two groups of studies were conducted using a computational model. The first studied esophageal transport with circumferential-longitudinal fiber architecture, helical fiber architecture and various combinations of the two. In the second group, cases with dual CWs and varied muscle fiber architecture were simulated. Overall transport characteristics were examined and the space-time profiles of luminal pressure were plotted and compared. KEY
RESULTS: Helical muscle fiber architecture featured reduced circumferential wall stress, greater esophageal distensibility, and greater axial shortening. Non-uniform fiber architecture featured a peristaltic pressure trough between two high-pressure segments. The distal pressure segment showed greater amplitude than the proximal segment, consistent with experimental data. Dual CWs also featured a pressure trough between two high-pressure segments. However, the minimum pressure in the region of overlap was much lower, and the amplitudes of the two high-pressure segments were similar. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The efficacy of esophageal transport is greatly affected by muscle fiber architecture. The peristaltic transition zone may be attributable to non-uniform architecture of muscle fibers along the length of the esophagus and/or dual CWs. The difference in amplitude between the proximal and distal pressure segments may be attributable to non-uniform muscle fiber architecture.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer simulation; esophageal manometry; esophageal myoarchitecture; esophageal peristalsis; transition zone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28054418      PMCID: PMC5423838          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  19 in total

1.  Local longitudinal muscle shortening of the human esophagus from high-frequency ultrasonography.

Authors:  M A Nicosia; J G Brasseur; J B Liu; L S Miller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Synchrony between circular and longitudinal muscle contractions during peristalsis in normal subjects.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Bikram Padda; Vikas Bhalla; Valmik Bhargava; Jianmin Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Function of longitudinal vs circular muscle fibers in esophageal peristalsis, deduced with mathematical modeling.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Mark A Nicosia; Anupam Pal; Larry S Miller
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Resolving the three-dimensional myoarchitecture of bovine esophageal wall with diffusion spectrum imaging and tractography.

Authors:  Richard J Gilbert; Terry A Gaige; Ruopeng Wang; Thomas Benner; Guangping Dai; Jonathan N Glickman; Van J Wedeen
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Biomechanical behaviour of oesophageal tissues: material and structural configuration, experimental data and constitutive analysis.

Authors:  Arturo N Natali; Emanuele L Carniel; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Simulation studies of circular muscle contraction, longitudinal muscle shortening, and their coordination in esophageal transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Analyses of normal and abnormal esophageal transport using computer simulations.

Authors:  M Li; J G Brasseur; W J Dodds
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-04

8.  Peristalsis in smooth muscle esophagus after transection and bolus deviation.

Authors:  J Janssens; I De Wever; G Vantrappen; J Hellemans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; W J Dodds; P J Kahrilas; J G Brasseur; I J Cook; I M Lang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-05

10.  Liquid in the gastroesophageal segment promotes reflux, but compliance does not: a mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.052

View more
  5 in total

1.  Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Hyun Joo Song; Young-Hoon Youn; Xinhuan Qiu; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Myotomy technique and esophageal contractility impact blown-out myotomy formation in achalasia: an in silico investigation.

Authors:  Sourav Halder; Shashank Acharya; Wenjun Kou; Ryan A J Campagna; Joseph R Triggs; Dustin A Carlson; Abdul Aziz Aadam; Eric S Hungness; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  A fully resolved multiphysics model of gastric peristalsis and bolus emptying in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Shashank Acharya; Sourav Halder; Wenjun Kou; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.698

4.  Stabilization approaches for the hyperelastic immersed boundary method for problems of large-deformation incompressible elasticity.

Authors:  Ben Vadala-Roth; Shashank Acharya; Neelesh A Patankar; Simone Rossi; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 6.756

5.  Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction.

Authors:  Boyce E Griffith; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 18.511

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.