Literature DB >> 18718998

Liquid in the gastroesophageal segment promotes reflux, but compliance does not: a mathematical modeling study.

Sudip K Ghosh1, Peter J Kahrilas, James G Brasseur.   

Abstract

The mechanical force relationships that distinguish normal from chronic reflux at sphincter opening are poorly understood and difficult to measure in vivo. Our aim was to apply physics-based computer simulations to determine mechanical pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux. A mathematical model of the gastroesophageal segment (GES) was developed, incorporating the primary anatomical and physiomechanical elements that drive GES opening and reflux. In vivo data were used to quantify muscle stiffness, sphincter tone, and gastric pressure. The liquid lining the mucosa was modeled as an "effective liquid film" between the mucosa and a manometric catheter. Newton's second law was solved mathematically, and the space-time details of opening and reflux were predicted for systematic variations in gastric pressure increase, film thickness, muscle stiffness, and tone. "Reflux" was defined as "2 ml of refluxate entering the esophagus within 1 s." GES opening and reflux were different events. Both were sensitive to changes in gastric pressure and sphincter tone. Reflux initiation was extremely sensitive to the liquid film thickness; the protective function of the sphincter was destroyed with only 0.4 mm of liquid in the GES. Compliance had no effect on reflux initiation, but affected reflux volume. The presence of abnormal levels of liquid within the collapsed GES can greatly increase the probability for reflux, suggesting a mechanical mechanism that may differentiate normal reflux from gastroesophageal reflux disease. Compliance does not affect the probability for reflux, but affects reflux volume once it occurs. Opening without reflux suggests the existence of "gastroesophageal pooling" in the distal esophagus, with clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718998      PMCID: PMC2584830          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.90310.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  48 in total

1.  Measuring esophageal distension by high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound probe.

Authors:  Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jianmin Liu; James L Puckett; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: II. Parameter estimation.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; R K Strumpf; F C Yin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Reduced tLESR elicitation in response to gastric distension in fundoplication patients.

Authors:  R C H Scheffer; R P Tatum; G Shi; L M A Akkermans; R J Joehl; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle.

Authors:  A Tøttrup; A Forman; N Uldbjerg; P Funch-Jensen; K E Andersson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-03

5.  Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M P Jones; S S Sloan; J C Rabine; C C Ebert; C F Huang; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings.

Authors:  D Sifrim; R Holloway; J Silny; Z Xin; J Tack; A Lerut; J Janssens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication decreases gastroesophageal junction distensibility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dennis Blom; Shailesh Bajaj; Jianxiang Liu; Candy Hofmann; Tanya Rittmann; Thomas Derksen; Reza Shaker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Rhys Ulerich; Qing Dai; Dalipkumar K Patel; Ahmed M S Soliman; Larry S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Barrett's esophagus evokes a quantitatively and qualitatively altered response to both acid and hypertonic solutions.

Authors:  Jonathan Fletcher; Derek Gillen; Angela Wirz; Kenneth E L McColl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Transnasal US of the esophagus: preliminary morphologic and function studies.

Authors:  J B Liu; L S Miller; B B Goldberg; R I Feld; A A Alexander; L Needleman; D O Castell; P J Klenn; C L Millward
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

1.  A continuum mechanics-based musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Boyce E Griffith; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Simulation studies of circular muscle contraction, longitudinal muscle shortening, and their coordination in esophageal transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Effects of mosapride on esophageal motor activity and esophagogastric junction compliance in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kousuke Fukazawa; Kenji Furuta; Kyoichi Adachi; Yoshiya Moritou; Tsukasa Saito; Ryusaku Kusunoki; Goichi Uno; Shino Shimura; Masahito Aimi; Shunji Ohara; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP).

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  An alginate-antacid formulation (Gaviscon Double Action Liquid) can eliminate or displace the postprandial 'acid pocket' in symptomatic GERD patients.

Authors:  M A Kwiatek; S Roman; A Fareeduddin; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Could the peristaltic transition zone be caused by non-uniform esophageal muscle fiber architecture? A simulation study.

Authors:  W Kou; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas; N A Patankar
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  A fully resolved active musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla; Boyce E Griffith; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe.

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; Kahrilas Kahrilas; Nathaniel J Soper; William J Bulsiewicz; Barry P McMahon; Hans Gregersen; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Effects of Metoclopramide on Esophageal Motor Activity and Esophagogastric Junction Compliance in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Hironobu Mikami; Norihisa Ishimura; Kousuke Fukazawa; Mayumi Okada; Daisuke Izumi; Shino Shimura; Eiko Okimoto; Masahito Aimi; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  Acotiamide Has No Effects on Esophageal Motor Activity or Esophagogastric Junction Compliance.

Authors:  Hironobu Mikami; Norihisa Ishimura; Mayumi Okada; Daisuke Izumi; Eiko Okimoto; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.