| Literature DB >> 26110252 |
Jie-Hua Chen1, Caiqun Ouyang2, Qiang Ding3, Jia Song4, Wenhong Cao5, Limei Mao6.
Abstract
Calorie restriction (CR) via manipulating dietary carbohydrates has attracted increasing interest in the prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. There is little consensus about the extent of carbohydrate restriction to elicit optimal results in controlling metabolic parameters. Our study will identify a better carbohydrate-restricted diet using rat models. Rats were fed with one of the following diets for 12 weeks: Control diet, 80% energy (34% carbohydrate-reduced) and 60% energy (68% carbohydrate-reduced) of the control diet. Changes in metabolic parameters and expressions of adiponectin and peroxisome proliferator activator receptor γ (PPARγ) were identified. Compared to the control diet, 68% carbohydrate-reduced diet led to a decrease in serum triglyceride and increases inlow density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol; a 34% carbohydrate-reduced diet resulted in a decrease in triglycerides and an increase in HDL-cholesterol, no changes however, were shown in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol; reductions in HOMA-IR were observed in both CR groups. Gene expressions of adiponectin and PPARγ in adipose tissues were found proportionally elevated with an increased degree of energy restriction. Our study for the first time ever identified that a moderate-carbohydrate restricted diet is not only effective in raising gene expressions of adiponectin and PPARγ which potentially lead to better metabolic conditions but is better at improving lipid profiles than a low-carbohydrate diet in rats.Entities:
Keywords: adiponectin; dietary carbohydrate restriction; dietary intervention; metabolic syndrome; peroxisome proliferator activator receptor γ; rats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26110252 PMCID: PMC4488810 DOI: 10.3390/nu7064724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of rat chow diet *.
| Components | AL Group | CR1 Group a | CR2 Group b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg Diet | % Energy | g/0.8 kg Diet | % Energy | g/0.6 kg Diet | % Energy | |
| Casein | 200.0 | 20.2 | 200.0 | 25.2 | 200.0 | 33.8 |
| Vitamin mix ** | 10.0 | - | 10.0 | - | 10.0 | - |
| Mineral mix ** | 35.0 | - | 35.0 | - | 35.0 | - |
| Sucrose | 50.0 | 5.0 | 50.0 | 6.3 | 50.0 | 8.4 |
| Corn starch | 585.0 | 58.9 | 385.0 | 48.6 | 185.0 | 31.2 |
| Fiber | 50.0 | - | 50.0 | - | 50.0 | - |
| Lipid | 70.0 | 15.9 | 70.0 | 19.9 | 70.0 | 26.6 |
| 1000.0 | 100.0 | 800.0 | 100.0 | 600.0 | 100.0 | |
| 3970.0 | 3170.0 | 2370.0 | ||||
| Protein/Total | 20 | 25 | 34 | |||
| Carbohydrate/Total | 64 | 55 | 40 | |||
| Lipid/Total | 16 | 20 | 26 | |||
* Abbreviations: AL: ad libitum; CR: calorie restriction; ** The composition of vitamin and mineral mix can be referred to AIN-93G; a CR1 group was provided with 80% of ad libitum intake based on AL group; b CR2 group was provided with 60% of ad libitum intake based on AL group.
Figure 1Weekly average calorie intakes of three groups over the 12-week feeding period. Average calorie intake of rats across all groups was shown to be higher at the beginning of the study when rats were fast-growing and then slowly decreased to a plateau with decreasing growth rates of rats. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD-test was used to detect significant differences of the means of the body weights at the end of the study ** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Change of body weights of rats from three groups over the 12-week feeding period. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD-test was used to detect significant differences of the means of the body weights at the end of the study ** p < 0.001.
Fasting blood lipid, metabolic and insulin responses in rats of different levels of calorie restriction †*.
| Group | mmol/L | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglyceride | Total Cholesterol | HDL-C | LDL-C | Total Cholesterol/HDL-C | Glucose | Insulin (IU/mL) | HOMA-IR # | |
| AL | 1.55 ± 0.59 | 1.47 ± 0.40 | 0.69 ± 0.16 | 0.47±0.39 | 2.14 ± 0.53 | 5.54 ± 0.98 | 23.92 ± 8.76 | 5.59 ± 0.41 |
| CR1 | 1.19 ± 0.32 a | 1.58 ± 0.39 | 0.82 ± 0.19 a | 0.52±0.47 | 1.95 ± 0.39 | 5.46 ± 0.67 | 16.02 ± 9.43 | 3.88 ± 0.63 a |
| CR2 | 0.92 ± 0.13 a | 2.09 ± 0.71 a | 0.92 ± 0.22 a | 0.99±0.61 a | 2.25 ± 0.36 | 5.97 ± 0.98 | 10.53 ± 7.59 a | 2.79 ± 0.58 a,b |
† Abbreviations: AL: ad libitum; CR: calorie restriction; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; * Blood samples were collected at the end of the study; Data was presented as arithmetic mean ± 1 SD (n = 12 for each group); # HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance) = Fasting Blood Glucose (mmol/L) × Fasting Insulin (mIU/L)/22.5 [19]; a p < 0.05 versus AL group; b p < 0.05 versus CR1 group.
Figure 3The effect of calorie restriction on serum adiponectin. Serum adiponectin showed no significant difference among all three groups at the beginning of the study. During the 12-week period, only CR2 group demonstrated a significant increase in serum adiponectin level as compared to the baseline. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD-test was used to detect significant differences of the means, * p < 0.05.
Effect of calorie restriction on visceral adipose tissue †.
| Group | Visceral Fat Mass [g] #,* | Visceral Fat Mass [%] *,Δ |
|---|---|---|
| AL | 16.47 ± 3.76 | 3.29 ± 0.48 |
| CR1 | 12.08 ± 3.71 a | 2.51 ± 0.68 a |
| CR2 | 6.72 ± 2.61 a,b | 1.79 ± 0.69 a,b |
† Abbreviations: AL: ad libitum; CR: calorie restriction; * Data was presented as arithmetic mean ± 1 S.D. n = 12 for each group; # Visceral Fat Mass [g] = total perirenal adipose tissue [g] + total peri-epididymal adipose tissue [g] [20]; Δ Visceral fat mass [%] = Visceral fat mass/Body weight × 100; a p < 0.05 versus AL group; b p < 0.05 versus CR1 group.
Figure 4The effect of calorie restriction on the expressions of adiponectin and PPARγ in adipose tissues. (A1, B1) demonstrate the expression levels of mRNA of β-actin, adiponectin and PPARγ, respectively, quantified by RT-PCR. The expression levels (absorbance) of mRNA of adiponectin and PPARγ were then normalized against those of β-actin (served as loading control) (A2, B2). One-way ANOVA followed by LSD-test was used to detect significant differences of the means, * p < 0.05.
Correlation analysis of adiponectin mRNA, PPARγ † mRNA with different serum parameters.
| Independent Variables | Adiponectin | PPARγ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight | −0.389 | 0.001 | −0.425 | 0.005 |
| Triglyceride | −0.345 | 0.042 | −0.532 | 0.032 |
| Total Cholesterol | 0.47 | 0.624 | 0.673 | 0.431 |
| HDL-C † | 0.376 | 0.026 | 0.354 | 0.032 |
| Glucose | 0.530 | 0.231 | 0.492 | 0.485 |
| Insulin | −0.411 | 0.003 | −0.537 | 0.013 |
† Abbreviations: PPAR-γ: peroxisome proliferator activator receptor γ; HDL-C: High density lipoprotein cholesterol.