BACKGROUND: We found previously that men with a predominance of large LDL particles (phenotype A) consuming high-fat diets (40-46% fat) show less lipoprotein benefits of low-fat diets (20-24% fat) than do men with a high-risk lipoprotein profile characterized by a predominance of small LDL (phenotype B). Furthermore, one-third of men with phenotype A consuming a high-fat diet converted to phenotype B with a low-fat diet. OBJECTIVE: We investigated effects of further reduction in dietary fat in men with persistence of LDL subclass phenotype A during both high- and low-fat diets. DESIGN:Thirty-eight men who had shown phenotype A after 4-6 wk of both high- and low-fat diets consumed for 10 d a 10%-fat diet (2.7% saturates) withreplacement of fat with carbohydrate and no change in cholesterol content or ratio of polyunsaturates to saturates. RESULTS: In 26 men, phenotype A persisted (stable A group) whereas 12 converted to phenotype B (change group). LDL cholesterol did not differ from previous values for 20-24%-fat diets in either group, whereas in the change group there were higher concentrations of triacylglycerol and apolipoprotein B; greater mass of HDL, large LDL-I, small LDL-III and LDL-IV, and HDL3; lower concentrations of HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I; and lower mass of large LDL-I and HDL2. CONCLUSIONS: There is no apparent lipoprotein benefit of reduction in dietary fat from 20-24% to 10% in men with large LDL particles: LDL-cholesterol concentration was not reduced, and in a subset of subjects there was a shift to small LDL along with increased triacylglycerol and reduced HDL-cholesterol concentrations.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We found previously that men with a predominance of large LDL particles (phenotype A) consuming high-fat diets (40-46% fat) show less lipoprotein benefits of low-fat diets (20-24% fat) than do men with a high-risk lipoprotein profile characterized by a predominance of small LDL (phenotype B). Furthermore, one-third of men with phenotype A consuming a high-fat diet converted to phenotype B with a low-fat diet. OBJECTIVE: We investigated effects of further reduction in dietary fat in men with persistence of LDL subclass phenotype A during both high- and low-fat diets. DESIGN: Thirty-eight men who had shown phenotype A after 4-6 wk of both high- and low-fat diets consumed for 10 d a 10%-fat diet (2.7% saturates) with replacement of fat with carbohydrate and no change in cholesterol content or ratio of polyunsaturates to saturates. RESULTS: In 26 men, phenotype A persisted (stable A group) whereas 12 converted to phenotype B (change group). LDL cholesterol did not differ from previous values for 20-24%-fat diets in either group, whereas in the change group there were higher concentrations of triacylglycerol and apolipoprotein B; greater mass of HDL, large LDL-I, small LDL-III and LDL-IV, and HDL3; lower concentrations of HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I; and lower mass of large LDL-I and HDL2. CONCLUSIONS: There is no apparent lipoprotein benefit of reduction in dietary fat from 20-24% to 10% in men with large LDL particles: LDL-cholesterol concentration was not reduced, and in a subset of subjects there was a shift to small LDL along with increased triacylglycerol and reduced HDL-cholesterol concentrations.
Authors: Sally Chiu; Nathalie Bergeron; Paul T Williams; George A Bray; Barbara Sutherland; Ronald M Krauss Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: David J Decewicz; David M Neatrour; Amy Burke; Mary Jane Haberkorn; Heather L Patney; Marina N Vernalis; Darrell L Ellsworth Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Jeff S Volek; Stephen D Phinney; Cassandra E Forsythe; Erin E Quann; Richard J Wood; Michael J Puglisi; William J Kraemer; Doug M Bibus; Maria Luz Fernandez; Richard D Feinman Journal: Lipids Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 1.880
Authors: Una Bradley; Michelle Spence; C Hamish Courtney; Michelle C McKinley; Cieran N Ennis; David R McCance; Jane McEneny; Patrick M Bell; Ian S Young; Steven J Hunter Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 9.461