Literature DB >> 12136380

Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve.

Svetlana Khaslavskaia1, Michel Ladouceur, Thomas Sinkjaer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) is associated with changes in the motor response of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle elicited by focal magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) with a stimulation intensity of 125% of the threshold of the relaxed right TA were obtained before, during, and after repetitive electrical stimulation of the CPN (trains of five pulses of 1 ms, at a frequency of 200 Hz, repeated every second with a 30-min duration). The MEP of the TA muscle elicited after repetitive electrical stimulation were increased by 104% (range: 18-263%), and the increase was maintained for up to 110 min (range: 15-110 min) after the end of nerve stimulation. This increase in the MEP of the TA muscle was associated with a decrease in the threshold from the stimulation-response curve. Furthermore, during that period the early component of the TA stretch reflex as well as the latency of the MEP did not significantly change. To further test the origin of the increased MEP, complementary experiments showed that MEP elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were also increased, but to a lesser degree (approximately 50%) than MEP elicited by TMS. It can be concluded that short-term nerve repetitive electrical stimulation of the lower extremities in healthy human participants can lead to a long-term increase in the contralateral MEP. As TES is believed to mainly activate the axon and not the soma of the cortical cells, the increased MEP cannot be explained exclusively by changes in the motor cortex cell excitability, but also by changes in subcortical neural structures involved in the excitation of spinal motoneurons. The results of this study allow the speculation that it would be possible to use repetitive electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with lower limb muscle weakness and spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136380     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1094-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles.

Authors:  Aiko Kido Thompson; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke.

Authors:  Teresa J Kimberley; Scott M Lewis; Edward J Auerbach; Lisa L Dorsey; Jeanne M Lojovich; James R Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of cortical motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Michael E Knash; Aiko Kido; Monica Gorassini; K Ming Chan; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on spinal excitatory and inhibitory reflexes in ankle extensor and flexor muscles.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Brian Doran; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke.

Authors:  V M Pomeroy; L King; A Pollock; A Baily-Hallam; P Langhorne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

Review 6.  The Olympic brain. Does corticospinal plasticity play a role in acquisition of skills required for high-performance sports?

Authors:  Jens Bo Nielsen; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles.

Authors:  C S Mang; J M Clair; D F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Changes in corticospinal excitability evoked by common peroneal nerve stimulation depend on stimulation frequency.

Authors:  C S Mang; O Lagerquist; D F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation increases ankle dorsiflexor motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Brandon Lapallo; Michael Duffield; Briana M Abel; Ferne Pomerantz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gergely I Barsi; Dejan B Popovic; Ina M Tarkka; Thomas Sinkjaer; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.