Literature DB >> 12730798

Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

H K Genant1, M Jergas.   

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are the hallmark of osteoporosis, and it has been shown that the presence of vertebral fractures adds to the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Thus, the evaluation of spinal radiographs for prevalent or incident vertebral fractures is important in the clinical evaluation of patients with osteoporosis, in clinical drug trials for osteoporosis treatment and in the epidemiologic evaluation of populations at risk for osteoporosis. Traditionally, conventional lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine have been analyzed visually by radiologists or experienced clinicians to identify vertebral fractures in patients with clinical indications. Epidemiologic studies or clinical drug trials in osteoporosis research have considerably different requirements and expectations. To reduce potential subjectivity in qualitative readings and to provide definable, reproducible and objective methods to detect vertebral fracture, and to accommodate the assessment of large numbers of radiographs, various morphometric approaches have been explored and employed. However, potential deficiencies in morphometry have led to a renewed interest in standardized qualitative visual approaches for defining vertebral fractures and visual criteria. Numerous studies have shown that semiquantitative interpretation, after careful centralized training and standardization, can produce results with excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility. We firmly believe that the experience from several studies has shown that there is a major role for radiologists and clinicians alike to carefully assess and diagnose vertebral fractures using standardized grading schemes such as the one proposed in this review. In the context of epidemiologic studies and clinical drug trials, quantitative morphometry may be used; however, the studies would be flawed if quantitative morphometry were to be performed in isolation without additional adjudication by a trained and highly experienced radiologist or clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730798     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-002-1348-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  50 in total

1.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Vertebral dimension differences between Caucasian populations, and between Caucasians and Japanese.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; S Silverman; K Andriano; H Genant; A Gimona; S Harris; D Kiel; M LeBoff; M Maricic; P Miller; C Moniz; M Peacock; P Richardson; N Watts; D Baylink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis.

Authors:  A A De Smet; R G Robinson; B E Johnson; B P Lukert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae.

Authors:  L M Hurxthal
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1968-07

7.  Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; S F Hodgson; W M O'Fallon; E Y Chao; H W Wahner; J M Muhs; S L Cedel; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  No secular increase in the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; V A Nielsen; G F Jensen; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; Y K Yhee; Y F He; J W Davis; C Kamimoto; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  64 in total

1.  The association of concurrent vitamin D and sex hormone deficiency with bone loss and fracture risk in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Gail A Laughlin; Hong Li; Carrie M Nielson; P Ying Wang; Tien T Dam; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Marcia L Stefanick; Edith Lau; Andrew R Hoffman; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Evaluation of three risk assessment tools in discriminating fracture status among Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  A-J Chang; Q Ying; X-N Chen; W-M Wang; N Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D E Wenger; E J Atkinson; S J Achenbach; T H Berquist; B L Riggs; G Jiang; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Identification of novel bone-specific molecular targets of binge alcohol and ibandronate by transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Himes; Frederick H Wezeman; John J Callaci
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Determinants of prevalent vertebral fractures and progressive bone loss in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jan Mares; Kristina Ohlidalova; Sylvie Opatrna; Jiri Ferda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Da Fonseca; Jochen Hillmeier; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Martin Libicher; Gerd Nöldge; Hubert Bardenheuer; Walter Pyerin; Linus Basler; Christel Weiss; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth; Christian Kasperk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Vitamin D status: effects on quality of life in osteoporosis among Turkish women.

Authors:  Sibel Basaran; Rengin Guzel; Ilke Coskun-Benlidayi; Fusun Guler-Uysal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.