| Literature DB >> 26098959 |
Silvia Pagano1, Elisa Fait1, Alessia Monti1, Debora Brignani2, Veronica Mazza3.
Abstract
To understand the nature of age-related changes in enumeration abilities we measured two ERP responses -N2pc and CDA, associated respectively to attentive individuation and VWM- and posterior alpha band (8-15 Hz) event-related desynchronization (ERD), traditionally linked to enhanced target processing. Two groups of old and young participants enumerated a variable number (1-6) of targets presented among distractors. Older participants were less accurate in enumerating targets. ERP results in old participants showed a suppression of N2pc amplitudes for all numerosities, and a decrease in CDA only for the largest set (4-6 targets). In contrast with the pattern for young adults, time/frequency results on older adults revealed neither a modulation of alpha oscillations as a function of target numerosity, nor an effect of ERD lateralization. These patterns indicate that both attention and working memory contribute to the age-related decline in enumeration, and point to an overall decrease in the activity of the visual areas responsible for the processing of the hemifield where the relevant objects are presented.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26098959 PMCID: PMC4476746 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and neuropsychological data relative to old participants.
| Subjects’ score range | Mean (SD) | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age | 69.8 (3.8) | ||
| Education | 12 (2.9) | 13 | |
|
| Raw scores | ||
| MMSE | 27–30 | 28.6 (1.08) | 29 |
| RCPM 47 | 25–36 | 32.7 (2.9) | 33.5 |
| Attentive Matrices (Visual Search) | 46–59 | 54.7 (3.6) | 55.5 |
| TMT A | 21–54 | 37.1 (9.5) | 35 |
| TMT B | 67–214 | 112.6 (42.2) | 100.5 |
| TMT B-A | 22–187 | 75.5 (41.5) | 66.5 |
| Stroop reaction times | 15–39.5 | 24.3 (7.3) | 24.2 |
| Stroop errors | -1.5- +5 | 0.7 (1.7) | 0 |
| Phonemic fluency | 23–59 | 38.8 (10.9) | 41.5 |
| Digit Span Forward | 4–8 | 5.7 (0.9) | 6 |
| Digit Span Backward | 3–8 | 4.6 (1.1) | 4 |
| ROCF-copy | 31–36 | 34.5 (1.4) | 35 |
| ROCF-recall | 7–25.5 | 17.4 (5.8) | 18 |
| RAVLT-immediate recall | 27–65 | 47.6 (10.6) | 46.5 |
| RAVLT-delayed recall | 6–15 | 11.5 (2.5) | 11.5 |
| Geriatric Depression Scale | 0–14 | 3.6 (3.6) | 2 |
The table represents the range of uncorrected values obtained from each test in our sample (subjects’ score range), the mean test scores (SD in parentheses), and the median values.
aAbbreviations: Mini Mental State Examination-MMSE [49], Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices-RCPM 47 [50]; Attentive matrices [51], Trail Making Test A and B [52], Stroop Test [53], Verbal fluency with phonemic cue [54], Digit span forward and backward [55], copy and recall of Rey-Osterrieth complex figure-ROCF [56], Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test-RAVLT (15 items), [57] and Geriatric Depression Scale [58]
Fig 1Stimulus example and accuracy results.
(A) Example of a trial with four targets Participants had to indicate the number of targets by clicking on one of the six squares in the response display. (B) Accuracy results (error rates) as a function of age group and numerosity.
Fig 2Event related potential results.
(A) ERP difference waveforms as a function of age group and numerosity. Panels represent respectively numerosities 1 to 6 for the old group group (left) and for the young group (right). (B) Mean amplitude values for the N2pc (200–300 ms) and CDA (400–600 ms) as a function of age group and numerosity.
Fig 3Time/frequency analysis results.
(A) Left: Time-frequency plots for the old and young group averaged across numerosities and side at PO7/8. The white dotted squares indicate the time-frequency bins used to analyze ERS/ERD in the alpha band. Right: Topographical maps of the alpha band in the 300–600 ms post-stimulus window plotted separately for the old and young group and collapsed across numerosities. Contralateral side is plotted on the left. (B) Posterior (PO7/8) ipsilateral and contralateral ERS/ERD time course averaged across numerosities in the old and young group in the alpha band. The young group shows a significant alpha lateralization effect starting around 300 ms post stimulus. (C) Mean alpha ERD as a function of numerosity, laterality and age in the 300–600 time window.