Literature DB >> 18417697

Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects.

Trafton Drew1, Edward K Vogel.   

Abstract

Attention can be divided so that multiple objects can be tracked simultaneously as they move among distractors. Although attentional tracking is known to be highly limited, such that most individuals can track only approximately four objects simultaneously, the neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie this capacity limitation have not been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological measures in humans of the initial selection and sustained attention processes that facilitate attentional tracking. Each measure was modulated by the number of objects the subject was tracking and was highly sensitive to each individual's specific tracking capacity. Consequently, these measures provide strong neurophysiological predictors of an individual's attentional tracking capacity. Moreover, by manipulating the difficulty of these two phases of the task, we observe that the limiting factor underlying tracking capacity can flexibly shift between these two attentional mechanisms depending on the requirements of the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18417697      PMCID: PMC2570324          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0556-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  53 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  A C Nobre; G N Sebestyen; C Miniussi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Matthias M Müller; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-03

4.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates.

Authors:  Geniva Liu; Erin L Austen; Kellogg S Booth; Brian D Fisher; Ritchie Argue; Mark I Rempel; James T Enns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

6.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Steven J Luck; Kai Boelmans; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Carsten N Boehler; Jochem Rieger; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

10.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  82 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  In and out of consciousness: sustained electrophysiological activity reflects individual differences in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Carson Pun; Stephen M Emrich; Kristin E Wilson; Erene Stergiopoulos; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Kara Morgan-Short; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Dynamic neuroplasticity after human prefrontal cortex damage.

Authors:  Bradley Voytek; Matar Davis; Elena Yago; Francisco Barceló; Edward K Vogel; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Andrew W McCollough; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

9.  Modulations in oscillatory activity with amplitude asymmetry can produce cognitively relevant event-related responses.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jurrian van der Werf; Ali Mazaheri; W Pieter Medendorp; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.