Literature DB >> 29698852

The trabecular effect: A population-based longitudinal study on age and sex differences in bone mineral density and vertebral load bearing capacity.

Marianna L Oppenheimer-Velez1, Hugo Giambini2, Asghar Rezaei3, Jon J Camp4, Sundeep Khosla5, Lichun Lu6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 16-24% of postmenopausal women are affected by vertebral fractures, negatively affecting their quality of life. Trabecular and cortical bones in vertebrae decline differently with age, thus having a distinct impact on vertebral failure loads. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density loss over time on estimated failure loads; and to evaluate the effect of sex and age.
METHOD: Fracture properties from a cohort of 82 patients were evaluated for L1-L3 vertebrae at baseline and 6th year using an image-based method that implements axial rigidity analysis. Cortical and trabecular volumetric bone mineral density were obtained, as well as their individual contribution to total failure load. Regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of age and sex on volumetric bone mineral density and failure loads.
FINDINGS: Decline in trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density, and failure load was sex-dependent (p ≤ 0.0095). Cortical and trabecular volumetric bone mineral density reduced 2.08 (g/cm3)/year and 2.02 (g/cm3)/year, respectively. A 1012 N difference in failure load, ~70% attributed to trabecular bone, was found between men and women of similar age. Over 6 years, this difference increased by 287 N. Areal bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry explained ~60% of the vertebral failure load.
INTERPRETATION: Trabecular bone has a significantly greater effect than cortical bone on the structural integrity and load bearing capacity of vertebrae. This might lead to a higher incidence of fragility fractures in osteoporotic women. Our non-invasive, quantitative computed tomography image-based approach may improve prevention, monitoring, and management of fractures.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis; Quantitative computed tomography; Sex; Trabecular bone

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29698852      PMCID: PMC5987206          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  28 in total

1.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Insights into material and structural basis of bone fragility from diseases associated with fractures: how determinants of the biomechanical properties of bone are compromised by disease.

Authors:  P Chavassieux; E Seeman; P D Delmas
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 3.  Classifying thoracolumbar fractures: role of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Pablo Tomás Muñoz; Elena Moya Sánchez; Marta Revelles Paniza; Alberto Martínez Martínez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Kirkham B Wood; Weishi Li; Darren R Lebl; Darren S Lebl; Avraam Ploumis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Risk factors and probability of vertebral body collapse in metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  H Taneichi; K Kaneda; N Takeda; K Abumi; S Satoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 7.  Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Femoral Strength Changes Faster With Age Than BMD in Both Women and Men: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Incidence and risk factors for vertebral fracture in women and men: 25-year follow-up results from the population-based Framingham study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Yuqing Zhang; Harry K Genant; David T Felson; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller Ii; Hao Xu; Haocheng Xu; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.698

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.