Literature DB >> 33872967

CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Asghar Rezaei1, Hugo Giambini2, Alan L Miller Ii3, Hao Xu1, Haocheng Xu1, Yong Li1, Michael J Yaszemski1, Lichun Lu4.   

Abstract

Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively assess vertebral fracture risk in metastatically-involved vertebral bodies. The aim of the current study was to develop an image-based computational technique to estimate fracture force outcomes during bending. To this end, mechanical testing was performed on intact, simulated defect, PMMA-augmented, and PPF-augmented 3-level spine segments from both sexes under a compression/flexion-type loading condition. The augmentation performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) were also evaluated and compared. Cylindrical defects were created in 3-level spine segments with attached posterior elements and ligaments. Using CT images of each segment, a rigidity analysis technique was developed and used for predicting fracture forces during bending. On average, PPF strengthened the segments by about 630 N, resulting in fracture forces similar to those observed in the intact and PMMA-augmented groups. Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. Rigidity analysis, along with age, explained 66% variability in experimental outcomes. This number increased to 74% when vertebral size and age were added to the rigidity analysis as explanatory variables. Both PPF and PMMA similarly increased fracture strength to the level of intact specimens. The results suggest that PPF can be a suitable candidate for augmentation purposes and rigidity analysis can be a promising predicting tool for vertebral fracture forces.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics of spine; Mechanical testing; Rigidity analysis; Vertebral augmentation; Vertebral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33872967      PMCID: PMC8750312          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   6.698


  31 in total

1.  Do metastases in vertebrae begin in the body or the pedicles? Imaging study in 45 patients.

Authors:  P R Algra; J J Heimans; J Valk; J J Nauta; M Lachniet; B Van Kooten
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Synthesis and properties of photocross-linked poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds.

Authors:  J P Fisher; T A Holland; D Dean; P S Engel; A G Mikos
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 3.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; C M Ford; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biphasic material properties of lytic bone metastases.

Authors:  C M Whyne; S S Hu; K L Workman; J C Lotz
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects.

Authors:  K M Whealan; S D Kwak; J R Tedrow; K Inoue; B D Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Painful osseous metastases.

Authors:  Howard S Smith
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effect of calcium phosphate coating and rhBMP-2 on bone regeneration in rabbit calvaria using poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds.

Authors:  Mahrokh Dadsetan; Teja Guda; M Brett Runge; Dindo Mijares; Racquel Z LeGeros; John P LeGeros; David T Silliman; Lichun Lu; Joseph C Wenke; Pamela R Brown Baer; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Zhong Fang; Heng Zeng; Jon J Camp; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 9.  Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects.

Authors:  J A Hipp; D S Springfield; W C Hayes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Kent D Carlson; Hao Xu; Susheil Uthamaraj; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-08-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.698

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.