Literature DB >> 30887275

Optimizing Accuracy of Proximal Femur Elastic Modulus Equations.

Asghar Rezaei1, Kent D Carlson1, Hugo Giambini2, Samad Javid3, Dan Dragomir-Daescu4.   

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) is a promising tool to predict femoral properties. One of the modeling parameters required as input for QCT/FEA is the elastic modulus, which varies with the location-dependent bone mineral density (ash density). The aim of this study was to develop optimized equations for the femoral elastic modulus. An inverse QCT/FEA method was employed, using an optimization process to minimize the error between the predicted femoral stiffness values and experimental values. We determined optimal coefficients of an elastic modulus equation that was a function of ash density only, and also optimal coefficients for several other equations that included along with ash density combinations of the variables sex and age. All of the optimized models were found to be more accurate than models from the literature. It was found that the addition of the variables sex and age to ash density made very minor improvements in stiffness predictions compared to the model with ash density alone. Even though the addition of age did not remarkably improve the statistical metrics, the effect of age was reflected in the elastic modulus equations as a decline of about 9% over a 60-year interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral stiffness; Inverse finite element analysis; Mechanical testing; Optimization; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887275      PMCID: PMC6506372          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02238-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  31 in total

1.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone.

Authors:  G L Niebur; M J Feldstein; J C Yuen; T J Chen; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Harun H Bayraktar; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A new method to evaluate the elastic modulus of cortical bone by using a combined computed tomography and finite element approach.

Authors:  Heng-Li Huang; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Dan-Jae Lin; Chi-Sheng Chien; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Alexander Cong; Jorn Op Den Buijs; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei; Andrea Malandrino; Luca Cristofolini; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review.

Authors:  Benedikt Helgason; Egon Perilli; Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei; Sigurdur Brynjólfsson; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.

Authors:  Joyce H Keyak; Tadashi S Kaneko; Jamshid Tehranzadeh; Harry B Skinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.

Authors:  D D Cody; G J Gross; F J Hou; H J Spencer; S A Goldstein; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Age-dependence of femoral strength in white women and men.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; David L Kopperdahl; L Joseph Melton; Paul F Hoffmann; Shreyasee Amin; B Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Maryam Tilton; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.698

2.  Risk modeling of femoral neck fracture based on geometric parameters of the proximal epiphysis.

Authors:  Anna D Shitova; Olga N Kovaleva; Anna V Olsufieva; Inchekhanum A Gadzhimuradova; Dmitry D Zubkov; Mikhail O Kniazev; Tatyana S Zharikova; Yury O Zharikov
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.