Literature DB >> 3675288

Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

A Heijl1, G Lindgren, J Olsson.   

Abstract

We assessed the variability of results in normal subjects of computerized static threshold perimetry of the central 30 degrees field. Variability of measured threshold values was highly dependent on eccentricity. This included variability among individuals, test-to-test variability within individuals, and intratest variability. All values were significantly larger in the midperiphery than centrally. We found that the mean sensitivity decrement with age was eccentricity dependent, so that the age-corrected normal visual field became not only depressed but also steeper with age. Distributions of individual pointwise deviations from the age-corrected normal mean thresholds were significantly nongaussian. The dependency of variability on test point location, the nongaussian distributions of deviations from age-corrected means, and the variability of age-induced sensitivity reduction should all be considered in the interpretation of computerized visual fields, and particularly in the design of statistical programs for field analysis. Programs not considering these factors are likely to result in misleading analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3675288     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060110090039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  121 in total

1.  Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  On weighted visual field indices.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson; P Asman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.

Authors:  Kelsey M Keltgen; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  W O Young; W C Stewart; H Hunt; H Crosswell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Characteristics of the normal central visual field measured with resolution perimetry.

Authors:  P House; M Schulzer; S Drance; G Douglas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The distribution of normal values in automated perimetry.

Authors:  C Rutishauser; J Flammer; A Haas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Richard A Levine; Juanjuan Fan; Kimberly E Cello; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

9.  Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac.

Authors:  A H Zalta; J C Burchfield
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Blur-resistant perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson; Tiffany Liu; Irene Tran
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.