Literature DB >> 21853374

Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of multifocal VEPs to diagnose and quantify glaucomatous functional damage.

Makoto Nakamura1, Kumiko Ishikawa, Takayuki Nagai, Akira Negi.   

Abstract

To test whether multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recording using two perpendicularly placed channels, as previously reported, to measure the degree of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution overlap between a signal window and a noise window would efficiently detect and quantify glaucomatous damage. Humphrey visual field (HVF) and mfVEP were recorded from 56 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and mean deviation less than -15 dB and 62 age-matched ophthalmologically normal individuals. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (SNR-AUC) were calculated based on the proportion of mfVEP responses that exceeded a specific SNR criterion for both windows. Abnormal sectors with an SNR deviated from the previously established norm with P<5% and 1% were counted. Diagnostic accuracy of the SNR-AUC was similar to that of the average total deviation (TD) of the HVF. The hemifield agreement to detect a defect in mfVEP and HVF was 77.1-87.3%, which was similar to previous reports using multiple channels. Correlation coefficients between SNR-AUC and average TD (0.74 in the upper hemifield and 0.65 in the lower) were significantly higher than those between the sums of abnormal locations on the mfVEP and HVF probability plots (0.27 and 0.33, respectively). Two perpendicular channels can detect and quantify functional damage due to glaucoma. The SNR-AUC may be used as a global index to quantify diffuse glaucomatous functional loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21853374     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9285-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  23 in total

Review 1.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Objective perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  C Balachandran; S L Graham; A Klistorner; I Goldberg
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Candice S Chen; Jenny E Hong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Optimizing electrode positions and analysis strategies for multifocal VEP recordings by ROC analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Meigen; Mathias Krämer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.

Authors:  Narakorn Leeprechanon; Annette Giangiacomo; Hector Fontana; Douglas Hoffman; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Emily Patterson; Annisa Jamil; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work?

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Bryan J Winn
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Regional relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and corresponding visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Akiyasu Kanamori; Maiko Naka; Azusa Nagai-Kusuhara; Yuko Yamada; Makoto Nakamura; Akira Negi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Reproducibility in the global indices for multifocal visual evoked potentials and Humphrey visual fields in controls and glaucomatous eyes within a 2-year period.

Authors:  Yukako Inoue; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  L Malmqvist; L De Santiago; C Fraser; A Klistorner; S Hamann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Effect of refractive errors on multifocal VEP responses and standard automated perimetry tests in a single population.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  A Single-Arm, Prospective, Exploratory Study to Preliminarily Test Effectiveness and Safety of Skin Electrical Stimulation for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Takuji Kurimoto; Kaori Ueda; Sotaro Mori; Seiko Kamada; Mari Sakamoto; Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi; Wataru Matsumiya; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.