B G Ashinsky1, C E Coletta2, M Bouhrara3, V A Lukas4, J M Boyle5, D A Reiter6, C P Neu7, I G Goldberg8, R G Spencer9. 1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: beth.ashinsky@gmail.com. 2. Image Informatics and Computational Biology Unit, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: christopher.coletta@nih.gov. 3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: mustapha.bouhrara2@nih.gov. 4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: vannylukas@gmail.com. 5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: jmboyle@oakland.edu. 6. Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: reiterda@nia.nih.gov. 7. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States. Electronic address: cpneu@purdue.edu. 8. Image Informatics and Computational Biology Unit, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: goldbergil@helix.nih.gov. 9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: spencer@helix.nih.gov.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of machine learning to discriminate between magnetic resonance images (MRI) of normal and pathological human articular cartilage obtained under standard clinical conditions. METHOD: An approach to MRI classification of cartilage degradation is proposed using pattern recognition and multivariable regression in which image features from MRIs of histologically scored human articular cartilage plugs were computed using weighted neighbor distance using compound hierarchy of algorithms representing morphology (WND-CHRM). The WND-CHRM method was first applied to several clinically available MRI scan types to perform binary classification of normal and osteoarthritic osteochondral plugs based on the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histological system. In addition, the image features computed from WND-CHRM were used to develop a multiple linear least-squares regression model for classification and prediction of an OARSI score for each cartilage plug. RESULTS: The binary classification of normal and osteoarthritic plugs yielded results of limited quality with accuracies between 36% and 70%. However, multiple linear least-squares regression successfully predicted OARSI scores and classified plugs with accuracies as high as 86%. The present results improve upon the previously-reported accuracy of classification using average MRI signal intensities and parameter values. CONCLUSION: MRI features detected by WND-CHRM reflect cartilage degradation status as assessed by OARSI histologic grading. WND-CHRM is therefore of potential use in the clinical detection and grading of osteoarthritis. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of machine learning to discriminate between magnetic resonance images (MRI) of normal and pathological humanarticular cartilage obtained under standard clinical conditions. METHOD: An approach to MRI classification of cartilage degradation is proposed using pattern recognition and multivariable regression in which image features from MRIs of histologically scored humanarticular cartilage plugs were computed using weighted neighbor distance using compound hierarchy of algorithms representing morphology (WND-CHRM). The WND-CHRM method was first applied to several clinically available MRI scan types to perform binary classification of normal and osteoarthritic osteochondral plugs based on the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histological system. In addition, the image features computed from WND-CHRM were used to develop a multiple linear least-squares regression model for classification and prediction of an OARSI score for each cartilage plug. RESULTS: The binary classification of normal and osteoarthritic plugs yielded results of limited quality with accuracies between 36% and 70%. However, multiple linear least-squares regression successfully predicted OARSI scores and classified plugs with accuracies as high as 86%. The present results improve upon the previously-reported accuracy of classification using average MRI signal intensities and parameter values. CONCLUSION: MRI features detected by WND-CHRM reflect cartilage degradation status as assessed by OARSI histologic grading. WND-CHRM is therefore of potential use in the clinical detection and grading of osteoarthritis. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Classification; Human articular cartilage; MRI; Osteoarthritis; Pattern recognition
Authors: Nikita Orlov; Lior Shamir; Tomasz Macura; Josiah Johnston; D Mark Eckley; Ilya G Goldberg Journal: Pattern Recognit Lett Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Jenny Folkesson; Erik B Dam; Ole F Olsen; Paola C Pettersen; Claus Christiansen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: S P Oakley; I Portek; Z Szomor; R C Appleyard; P Ghosh; B W Kirkham; G A C Murrell; M N Lassere Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K P H Pritzker; S Gay; S A Jimenez; K Ostergaard; J-P Pelletier; P A Revell; D Salter; W B van den Berg Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Peter D Gatehouse; Rhidian W Thomas; Matthew D Robson; Gavin Hamilton; Amy H Herlihy; Graeme M Bydder Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ehsan Saadat; Bjoern Jobke; Bill Chu; Ying Lu; Jonathan Cheng; Xiaojuan Li; Michael D Ries; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Beth G Ashinsky; Mustapha Bouhrara; Christopher E Coletta; Benoit Lehallier; Kenneth L Urish; Ping-Chang Lin; Ilya G Goldberg; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Shinjini Kundu; Beth G Ashinsky; Mustapha Bouhrara; Erik B Dam; Shadpour Demehri; Mohammad Shifat-E-Rabbi; Richard G Spencer; Kenneth L Urish; Gustavo K Rohde Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Teodoro Martín Noguerol; Jose G Raya; Daniel E Wessell; Joan C Vilanova; Ignacio Rossi; Antonio Luna Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Michiel Siebelt; Dirk Das; Amber Van Den Moosdijk; Tristan Warren; Peter Van Der Putten; Walter Van Der Weegen Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Hafsa Khalid; Muzammil Hussain; Mohammed A Al Ghamdi; Tayyaba Khalid; Khadija Khalid; Muhammad Adnan Khan; Kalsoom Fatima; Khalid Masood; Sultan H Almotiri; Muhammad Shoaib Farooq; Aqsa Ahmed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-07-26
Authors: Jonas Bianchi; João Roberto Gonçalves; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Júlia Vieira Pastana Bianchi; Lawrence M Ashman; Marilia Yatabe; Erika Benavides; Fabiana Naomi Soki; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonas Bianchi; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; João Roberto Gonçalves; Beatriz Paniagua; Juan Carlos Prieto; Martin Styner; Tengfei Li; Hongtu Zhu; James Sugai; William Giannobile; Erika Benavides; Fabiana Soki; Marilia Yatabe; Lawrence Ashman; David Walker; Reza Soroushmehr; Kayvan Najarian; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.379