R Drew Sayer1, Amy J Wright1, Ningning Chen2, Wayne W Campbell3. 1. Departments of Nutrition Science and. 2. Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 3. Departments of Nutrition Science and campbellw@purdue.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major, modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease and premature mortality that is improved by the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet. The DASH diet emphasizes increased consumption of fruit and vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy, nuts, and poultry and fish and reduced intakes of fats, red meats (including pork), sodium, and added sugars. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether the consumption of lean pork compared with the consumption of chicken and fish as the predominant protein source in a DASH-style diet affected blood pressure (BP) control in men and women with elevated BP. DESIGN: In a randomized crossover study, 13 women and 6 men [mean ± SEM age: 61 ± 2 y; BMI (in kg/m²): 31.2 ± 1.4] with elevated BP [systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 130 ± 2/85 ± 2 mm Hg] consumed a DASH-style diet for two 6-wk controlled dietary interventions (with a 4-wk diet washout between interventions) with either lean pork [DASH diet with pork (DASH-P)] or chicken and fish [DASH diet with chicken and fish (DASH-CF), the control diet] as the major protein source (55% of total protein intake). SBP and DBP were measured manually and with a 24-h BP monitoring system on 3 d before and 3 d at the end of each diet intervention. RESULTS: Preintervention manual BP (DASH-P: 130/84 ± 2/1 mm Hg; DASH-CF: 129/84 ± 2/1 mg Hg) and postintervention manual BP (DASH-P: 122/79 ± 2/1 mm Hg; DASH-CF: 123/78 ± 3/1) were not different between the DASH-P and DASH-CF. Consumption of these DASH-style diets for 6 wk reduced all measures of BP (P < 0.05) with no differences in responses between the DASH-CF and DASH-P. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that adults with elevated BP may effectively incorporate lean pork into a DASH-style diet for BP reduction.
BACKGROUND:Hypertension is a major, modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular and kidney disease and premature mortality that is improved by the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet. The DASH diet emphasizes increased consumption of fruit and vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy, nuts, and poultry and fish and reduced intakes of fats, red meats (including pork), sodium, and added sugars. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether the consumption of lean pork compared with the consumption of chicken and fish as the predominant protein source in a DASH-style diet affected blood pressure (BP) control in men and women with elevated BP. DESIGN: In a randomized crossover study, 13 women and 6 men [mean ± SEM age: 61 ± 2 y; BMI (in kg/m²): 31.2 ± 1.4] with elevated BP [systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 130 ± 2/85 ± 2 mm Hg] consumed a DASH-style diet for two 6-wk controlled dietary interventions (with a 4-wk diet washout between interventions) with either lean pork [DASH diet with pork (DASH-P)] or chicken and fish [DASH diet with chicken and fish (DASH-CF), the control diet] as the major protein source (55% of total protein intake). SBP and DBP were measured manually and with a 24-h BP monitoring system on 3 d before and 3 d at the end of each diet intervention. RESULTS: Preintervention manual BP (DASH-P: 130/84 ± 2/1 mm Hg; DASH-CF: 129/84 ± 2/1 mg Hg) and postintervention manual BP (DASH-P: 122/79 ± 2/1 mm Hg; DASH-CF: 123/78 ± 3/1) were not different between the DASH-P and DASH-CF. Consumption of these DASH-style diets for 6 wk reduced all measures of BP (P < 0.05) with no differences in responses between the DASH-CF and DASH-P. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that adults with elevated BP may effectively incorporate lean pork into a DASH-style diet for BP reduction.
Authors: T M Vogt; L J Appel; E Obarzanek; T J Moore; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N M Karanja Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 1999-08
Authors: Robert H Eckel; John M Jakicic; Jamy D Ard; Janet M de Jesus; Nancy Houston Miller; Van S Hubbard; I-Min Lee; Alice H Lichtenstein; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Thomas A Wadden; Susan Z Yanovski; Karima A Kendall; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; George Velasco; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W C Willett; F Sacks; A Trichopoulou; G Drescher; A Ferro-Luzzi; E Helsing; D Trichopoulos Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: F M Sacks; L P Svetkey; W M Vollmer; L J Appel; G A Bray; D Harsha; E Obarzanek; P R Conlin; E R Miller; D G Simons-Morton; N Karanja; P H Lin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-01-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: L J Appel; T J Moore; E Obarzanek; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; T M Vogt; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N Karanja Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael A Roussell; Alison M Hill; Trent L Gaugler; Sheila G West; John P Vanden Heuvel; Petar Alaupovic; Peter J Gillies; Penny M Kris-Etherton Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Karen J Murphy; Barbara Parker; Kathryn A Dyer; Courtney R Davis; Alison M Coates; Jonathan D Buckley; Peter R C Howe Journal: Nutrients Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Sally Chiu; Nathalie Bergeron; Paul T Williams; George A Bray; Barbara Sutherland; Ronald M Krauss Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: D Enette Larson-Meyer; Bennett C Ingold; Samanta R Fensterseifer; Kathleen J Austin; Perry J Wechsler; Bruce W Hollis; Andrew J Makowski; Brenda M Alexander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240