| Literature DB >> 26060570 |
Yasuhiro Masuya1, Yuko Okamoto2, Keisuke Inohara3, Yukiko Matsumura1, Toru Fujioka1, Yuji Wada4, Hirotaka Kosaka4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) is higher in men than in women. The extreme male brain theory proposes that excessive prenatal testosterone activity could be a risk factor for ASDs. However, it is unclear whether prenatal sex hormone activity is a risk factor for women. The ratio of the length of the second to fourth digits (2D:4D) is considered to be a biomarker of the prenatal ratio of testosterone to estrogen. Therefore, this study compared the 2D:4D ratios of women with and without ASDs to determine if prenatal sex hormone activity could be a risk factor for ASDs in women.Entities:
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorders; Digit ratio; Etiology; Prenatal estrogen; Prenatal testosterone; Sex difference
Year: 2015 PMID: 26060570 PMCID: PMC4460687 DOI: 10.1186/s13229-015-0028-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Autism Impact factor: 7.509
Demographic data
| ASDs | TD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| Number | 35 | 17 | 59 | 57 |
| Age | 29.7 ± 7.1 | 25.9 ± 6.6 | 27.0 ± 7.9 | 28.5 ± 11.3 |
| WAIS | ||||
| FSIQ | 102.3 ± 15.0 | 98.6 ± 10.9 | ||
| vIQ | 105.6 ± 17.6 | 99.3 ± 11.6 | ||
| pIQ | 97.4 ± 14.3 | 98.1 ± 10.9 | ||
| AQ | ||||
| Total | 33.8 ± 5.2 | 33.2 ± 3.9 | 14.1 ± 3.6 | 11.2 ± 4.1 |
| Social | 8.2 ± 1.9 | 8.3 ± 1.8 | 2.5 ± 1.8 | 1.6 ± 1.7 |
| Attention switching | 7.4 ± 1.9 | 7.8 ± 1.4 | 3.7 ± 1.7 | 2.9 ± 1.3 |
| Attention to detail | 5.2 ± 2.6 | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 3.5 ± 2.3 | 3.6 ± 2.0 |
| Communication | 7.1 ± 2.1 | 7.2 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.4 |
| Imagination | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 2.9 ± 1.7 | 1.8 ± 1.4 |
Age, IQ scores, and AQ scores are shown as mean ± SD
ASD autism spectrum disorder, TD typically developed, WAIS Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition (Wechsler, 1997), AQ Autism-spectrum quotient
Digit length and 2D:4D ratios in each group
| Men | Women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASDs | TD | ASDs vs TD | ASDs | TD | ASDs vs TD | |||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD |
|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD |
|
| |
| Digit length | ||||||||
| Right 2D | 7.21 ± 0.36 | 7.17 ± 0.43 | 0.10 | 6.61 ± 0.42 | 6.66 ± 0.39 | 0.13 | ||
| Right 4D | 7.68 ± 0.33 | 7.53 ± 0.45 | † | 0.37 | 6.82 ± 0.42 | 7.00 ± 0.44 | 0.41 | |
| Left 2D | 7.24 ± 0.35 | 7.17 ± 0.41 | 0.18 | 6.56 ± 0.43 | 6.62 ± 0.37 | 0.16 | ||
| Left 4D | 7.67 ± 0.36 | 7.55 ± 0.57 | 0.24 | 6.84 ± 0.44 | 6.99 ± 0.44 | 0.34 | ||
| 2D:4D ratio | ||||||||
| Right | 0.939 ± 0.029 | 0.952 ± 0.026 | * | 0.48 | 0.970 ± 0.035 | 0.953 ± 0.032 | * | 0.52 |
| Left | 0.944 ± 0.029 | 0.950 ± 0.029 | 0.21 | 0.963 ± 0.047 | 0.948 ± 0.033 | 0.41 | ||
| Right minus left | −0.005 ± 0.021 | 0.003 ± 0.027 | 0.32 | 0.008 ± 0.035 | 0.005 ± 0.029 | 0.10 | ||
Digit length and 2D:4D ratios for each group are shown as mean ± SD. Digit lengths are shown in cm. p values of post hoc pair-wise comparisons and Cohen’s d values of comparison between ASDs and TD for each sex are presented
†p < 0.10; *p < 0.05
Fig. 1Group differences in right digit length and right 2D:4D ratio. Panels a and b show group differences in right digit length and right 2D:4D ratios, respectively. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. †p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Correlation between AQ and digit length or 2D:4D ratios in each group
| Men | Women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASDs | TD | ASDs | TD | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Digit length | ||||||||
| Right 2D | −0.28 | 0.104 | 0.02 | 0.868 | 0.25 | 0.338 | −0.03 | 0.842 |
| Right 4D | −0.15 | 0.384 | 0.01 | 0.942 | 0.17 | 0.503 | −0.01 | 0.951 |
| Left 2D | −0.24 | 0.168 | −0.02 | 0.898 | 0.21 | 0.430 | 0.06 | 0.684 |
| Left 4D | −0.16 | 0.366 | 0.04 | 0.762 | −0.05 | 0.861 | 0.01 | 0.936 |
| 2D:4D ratio | ||||||||
| Right | −0.21 | 0.215 | 0.03 | 0.800 | 0.12 | 0.657 | −0.03 | 0.817 |
| Left | −0.13 | 0.474 | −0.12 | 0.369 | 0.27 | 0.296 | 0.06 | 0.643 |
| Right minus left | −0.13 | 0.470 | 0.15 | 0.244 | −0.24 | 0.349 | −0.10 | 0.442 |
r and p values for the correlation analysis are shown for each group. Note that there were no significant correlations for any of the groups