Literature DB >> 17373585

The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D).

John T Manning1, Andrew J G Churchill, Michael Peters.   

Abstract

We used self-reported direct finger measurements from 255,116 participants in a BBC Internet survey to investigate the measurement of 2D:4D ratios and their association with sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. We found significant sex differences such that males had lower 2D:4D than females and the effect size of the sex differences was greatest for right hand 2D:4D. Mean 2D:4D was lower for right hands than for left hands in men, but lower for left hands compared to right hands in women. The sexual dimorphism in 2D:4D was present across ethnic and country groupings, suggesting that it is universal in humans. However, there was also evidence that mean 2D:4D varied across ethnic groups with higher ratios for Whites, Non-Chinese Asians, and Mid-Easterners and lower ratios in Chinese and Black samples. There were significant differences in 2D:4D across sexual orientation groups but these were confined to men. Male homosexuals and bisexuals had higher mean 2D:4D (suggesting exposure to lower prenatal T) than heterosexuals. The effect was present in Whites, but there was no evidence for the pattern among Black and Chinese participants. In women, there were no significant effects of sexual orientation on 2D:4D. Most studies of sexual orientation effects on 2D:4D have measured finger length from photocopies of the hands. In comparison, our self-reported measures gave higher mean 2D:4D, lower effect sizes, and, in some instances, different patterns of effect size. The implications of our findings for future research into 2D:4D are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17373585     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-007-9171-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  46 in total

1.  Avian hind-limb digit length ratios measured from radiographs are sexually dimorphic.

Authors:  Barbara Leoni; Diego Rubolini; Maria Romano; Mauro di Giancamillo; Nicola Saino
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders.

Authors:  John M Coates; Mark Gurnell; Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Campbell Rolian; Lisa Cashmore; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Does digit ratio (2D:4D) predict penile length?

Authors:  Denise Brooks McQuade
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Age differences in prenatal testosterone's protective effects on disordered eating symptoms: developmental windows of expression?

Authors:  Kristen M Culbert; S Marc Breedlove; Cheryl L Sisk; Pamela K Keel; Michael C Neale; Steven M Boker; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Second to fourth digit ratio: a predictor of adult penile length.

Authors:  In Ho Choi; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Soo Woong Kim; Tae Beom Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Cross-sectional data on soft tissue morphometry of the growing hand and fingers of dextral individuals 5-65 years old.

Authors:  T M Mayhew
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Conscientiousness as a mediator of the association between masculinized finger-length ratios and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Michelle M Martel
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  Sex and race differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in human skeletons.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Mary S Bracht
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Female digit length ratio (2D:4D) and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  M P Vélez; T E Arbuckle; P Monnier; W D Fraser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.