Literature DB >> 17160984

Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts.

Martin Voracek1, John T Manning, Stefan G Dressler.   

Abstract

The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) is sexually differentiated (lower in men than in women), a likely biomarker for organizational (permanent) effects of prenatal testosterone, and a correlate of many sex-dependent, hormonally influenced traits and phenotypes. The extent of 2D:4D measurement repeatability across different research groups is unknown. This study assessed the repeatability and interobserver error of 2D:4D measurements made by 17 experts (researchers who have contributed to the 2D:4D literature). Results indicate that 2D:4D, because it is a ratio variable, is notably less precisely measurable than finger length. Absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients for these traits are about 0.75 vs. about 0.95, respectively. Associations of 2D:4D with target traits were usually of small size; measurement unreliability attenuates effects. This may explain some null findings and replication failures encountered in 2D:4D research. However, agreement levels are still sufficient to permit conclusions about findings from different research groups. One implication of this is that the marked geographical and population differences in typical 2D:4D levels, as reported in the literature, are veridical, and not due to divergent measurement habits across research groups. Some practical recommendations for 2D:4D measurement are offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17160984     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  33 in total

1.  The 2D:4D digit ratio is not a useful marker for prenatal famine exposure: Evidence from the Dutch hunger winter families study.

Authors:  Aryeh D Stein; Henry S Kahn; L H Lumey
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.937

2.  Comparison of digit ratio (2D:4D) between Brazilian men with and without prostate cancer.

Authors:  P H C Mendes; D R B Martelli; S de Melo Costa; E Gonçalves; C P Macedo; M F Silveira; H Martelli Júnior
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Exploring the organizational effect of prenatal testosterone upon the sporting brain.

Authors:  Jim Golby; Jennifer Meggs
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Assessment of the 2D:4D ratio in aggression-related injuries in children attending a paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  D E O'Briain; P H Dawson; J C Kelly; P Connolly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Conscientiousness as a mediator of the association between masculinized finger-length ratios and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Michelle M Martel
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 8.982

6.  Heritability of digit ratio (2D:4D) in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Martin Voracek
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Finger bone immaturity and 2D:4D ratio measurement error in the assessment of the hyperandrogenic hypothesis for the etiology of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Michael S Bloom; Allison S Houston; James L Mills; Cynthia A Molloy; Mary L Hediger
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-21

8.  Sex and hand differences in circadian wrist activity are independent from sex and hand differences in 2D:4D.

Authors:  Camille Reuter; Denise B McQuade
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2009-10-29

9.  Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans.

Authors:  Heather C Allaway; Terri G Bloski; Roger A Pierson; Marla E Lujan
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.937

10.  Digit ratios do not serve as anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Marla E Lujan; Terri G Bloski; Donna R Chizen; Denis C Lehotay; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.