Literature DB >> 24989368

Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful.

Mohan Doss1, Mark P Little2, Colin G Orton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24989368      PMCID： PMC4109571          DOI： 10.1118/1.4881095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Radiation hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis.

Authors:  E J Calabrese; L A Baldwin
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Biological effects of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure on interventional cardiologists.

Authors:  F Zakeri; T Hirobe; K Akbari Noghabi
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 3.  A review of non-cancer effects, especially circulatory and ocular diseases.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006.

Authors:  G M Kendall; M P Little; R Wakeford; K J Bunch; J C H Miles; T J Vincent; J R Meara; M F G Murphy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Curvature in the cancer mortality dose response in Japanese atomic bomb survivors: absence of evidence of threshold.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Threshold and other departures from linear-quadratic curvature in the non-cancer mortality dose-response curve in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Carcinogenic risks of prenatal ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Robert L Brent
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.926
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Spatial prediction of naturally occurring gamma radiation in Great Britain.

Authors:  P Chernyavskiy; G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M P Little
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Mathematical models of tissue stem and transit target cell divisions and the risk of radiation- or smoking-associated cancer.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Cancer risk assessment in modern radiotherapy workflow with medical big data.

Authors:  Fu Jin; Huan-Li Luo; Juan Zhou; Ya-Nan He; Xian-Feng Liu; Ming-Song Zhong; Han Yang; Chao Li; Qi-Cheng Li; Xia Huang; Xiu-Mei Tian; Da Qiu; Guang-Lei He; Li Yin; Ying Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 6.  The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Joubin Jebelli; Michael C Hamper; Danielle Van Quelef; Davian Caraballo; James Hartmann; James Kumi-Diaka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  Response to "Comment on 'Background Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-Based Nationwide Cohort Study'".

Authors:  Ben D Spycher; Martin Röösli; Matthias Egger; Claudia E Kuehni
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Comment on "Background Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-Based Nationwide Cohort Study".

Authors:  Jeffry A Siegel; Bill Sacks; Ludwig E Feinendegen; James S Welsh; Krzysztof W Fornalski; Mark Miller; Jeffrey Mahn; Leo Gomez; Michael G Stabin; Patricia Lewis; Vincent J Esposito; Andrzej Strupczewski; Charles W Pennington; Jerry M Cuttler; Chary Rangacharyulu; Chris Davey; Shizuyo Sutou
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Persistent Impact of In utero Irradiation on Mouse Brain Structure and Function Characterized by MR Imaging and Behavioral Analysis.

Authors:  Tine Verreet; Janaki Raman Rangarajan; Roel Quintens; Mieke Verslegers; Adrian C Lo; Kristof Govaerts; Mieke Neefs; Liselotte Leysen; Sarah Baatout; Frederik Maes; Uwe Himmelreich; Rudi D'Hooge; Lieve Moons; Mohammed A Benotmane
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.558
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.