Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Treatment differences between urban and rural women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on 21-gene assay recurrence score result.

Literature DB >> 26029936

Treatment differences between urban and rural women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on 21-gene assay recurrence score result.

Molly Andreason¹, Chong Zhang², Adedayo A Onitilo³, Jessica Engel⁴, Wendy M Ledesma⁵, Kimberly Ridolfi⁶, KyungMann Kim⁷, John C Charlson⁶, Kari B Wisinski⁸, Amye J Tevaarwerk⁹.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical Disease Gene Species

Keywords: OncotypeDX; breast cancer; gene assay; recurrence score; rural-urban disparities

Year: 2015 PMID： 26029936 PMCID： PMC4511377 DOI： 10.12788/jcso.0135

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Community Support Oncol ISSN： 2330-7749

× No keyword cloud information.

23 in total

1. Obesity and physical inactivity in rural America.

Authors: Paul Daniel Patterson; Charity G Moore; Janice C Probst; Judith Ann Shinogle
Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.333

2. Receipt of cancer screening services: surprising results for some rural minorities.

Authors: Kevin J Bennett; Janice C Probst; Jessica D Bellinger
Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 4.333

3. Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.

Authors: Peter D Baade; Gavin Turrell; Joanne F Aitken
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2011-01-30 Impact factor: 3.710

4. Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

Authors: Soonmyung Paik
Journal: Oncologist Date: 2007-06

5. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20.

Authors: Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Soonmyung Paik; Stewart J Anderson; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 4.872

6. The role of race and residence in determining stage at diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors: C H Amey; M K Miller; S L Albrecht
Journal: J Rural Health Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.333

7. Rural v. urban aspects of cancer: first-year data from the Mississippi Central Cancer Registry.

Authors: J C Higginbotham; J Moulder; M Currier
Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2001-07

Review 8. Breast cancer statistics, 2011.

Authors: Carol DeSantis; Rebecca Siegel; Priti Bandi; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 508.702

Treatment differences between urban and rural women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on 21-gene assay recurrence score result.

1. Obesity and physical inactivity in rural America.

2. Receipt of cancer screening services: surprising results for some rural minorities.

3. Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.

4. Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

5. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20.

6. The role of race and residence in determining stage at diagnosis of breast cancer.

7. Rural v. urban aspects of cancer: first-year data from the Mississippi Central Cancer Registry.

Review 8. Breast cancer statistics, 2011.

9. Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.

10. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status.

Review 1. Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography.

Review 2. Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

3. Hospital Rurality and Gene Expression Profiling for Early-Stage Breast Cancer among Iowa Residents (2010-2018).