Literature DB >> 21282144

Geographic remoteness, area-level socio-economic disadvantage and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional, multilevel study.

Peter D Baade1, Gavin Turrell, Joanne F Aitken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing disparities in cancer outcomes is a major priority for cancer-control agencies. The authors examine the relationships between geographic remoteness, area disadvantage and risk of advanced breast cancer among women.
METHODS: Multilevel models were used to assess the area- and individual-level contributions to the risk of advanced breast cancer among women aged 30-79 years diagnosed as having breast cancer in Queensland, Australia between 1997 and 2006 (n=18,658).
RESULTS: Women who resided in the most socio-economically disadvantaged areas were significantly more likely (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.37) than residents of the most advantaged areas to be diagnosed as having advanced breast cancer after adjustment for individual-level factors. When geographic remoteness and area-disadvantage (and all the individual-level factors) were simultaneously adjusted, the rates of advanced breast cancer were significantly higher for women residing in Outer Regional areas (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24) and those who lived in the most disadvantaged areas (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.32). There was no statistically significant interaction between geographic remoteness and area disadvantage.
CONCLUSIONS: A woman's risk of being diagnosed as having advanced breast cancer depends on where she lives, separate from the individual characteristics of the woman herself. Both the rurality and socio-economic characteristics of the geographical area in which women lived were important. The socio-economic factors contributing to advanced breast cancer, existing in both urban and rural environments, need to be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282144     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.114777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

1.  Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Emmanuel Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

2.  Disparity of Colon Cancer Outcomes in Rural America: Making the Case to Travel the Extra Mile.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Mohamed A Adam; Megan C Turner; Harvey G Moore; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Looking at cancer health disparities without the colored lenses.

Authors:  Mohammad Aslam Khan; Girijesh Kumar Patel; Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava; James Elliot Carter; Jennifer Young Pierce; Rodney Paul Rocconi; Seema Singh; Ajay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2019-08-19

4.  Primary care physician supply, insurance type, and late-stage cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Treatment differences between urban and rural women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on 21-gene assay recurrence score result.

Authors:  Molly Andreason; Chong Zhang; Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica Engel; Wendy M Ledesma; Kimberly Ridolfi; KyungMann Kim; John C Charlson; Kari B Wisinski; Amye J Tevaarwerk
Journal:  J Community Support Oncol       Date:  2015-05

6.  Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland.

Authors:  Daniel Lindsay; Nicole Bates; Abbey Diaz; Kerrianne Watt; Emily Callander
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Geographic residency status and census tract socioeconomic status as determinants of colorectal cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Robert Hines; Talar Markossian; Asal Johnson; Frank Dong; Rana Bayakly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Risk of several cancers is higher in urban areas after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Results from a two-country population-based study of 18 common cancers.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; David Donnelly; Avril Hegarty; Anne-Elie Carsin; Sandra Deady; Neil McCluskey; Anna Gavin; Harry Comber
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Neighborhood factors associated with time to resolution following an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test.

Authors:  Jesse J Plascak; Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Rory C Weier; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Shanita D Williams; Mohammad Siahpush; Aaron Mulhollen
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.