Literature DB >> 22236316

Receipt of cancer screening services: surprising results for some rural minorities.

Kevin J Bennett1, Janice C Probst, Jessica D Bellinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that rural minority populations experience disparities in cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes. It is unknown how race/ethnicity and rurality intersect in these disparities. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the cancer screening rates among minorities in rural areas.
METHODS: We utilized the 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to examine rates of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Bivariate analysis estimated screening rates by rurality and sociodemographics. Multivariate analysis estimated the factors that contributed to the odds of screening.
RESULTS: Rural residents were less likely to obtain screenings than urban residents. African Americans were more likely to be screened than whites or Hispanics. Race/ethnicity and rurality interacted, showing that African American women continued to be more likely than whites to be screened for breast or cervical cancer, but the odds decreased with rurality.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirmed previous research which found that rural residents were less likely to obtain cancer screenings than other residents. We further found that the pattern of disparity differed according to race/ethnicity, with African Americans having favorable odds of receipt of service regardless of rurality. These results have the potential to create better targeted interventions to those groups that continue to be underserved.
© 2011 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22236316     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00365.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  31 in total

1.  Characteristics of US counties with no mammography capacity.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Jacqueline Miller; Thomas B Richards; Janet Kay Bobo; Ta Liu; Mary C White; Djenaba Joseph; Florence Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-12

Review 2.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Melissa A Romaire; Susan G Haber; Florence K Tangka; Susan A Sabatino; David H Howard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Challenges of using nationally representative, population-based surveys to assess rural cancer disparities.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?

Authors:  Shannon M Monnat
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02

6.  Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.

Authors:  Alejandro G Hughes; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; Paulette Schnell; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

7.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Lara A Rosenwasser; Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld; Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Amanda N Perry; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Allison E Anderson; Kevin A Henry; N Jewel Samadder; Ray M Merrill; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

10.  Is Travel Time to Colonoscopy Associated With Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Iowa?

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Kevin A Matthews; Anne Gaglioti; Camden Bay; Bradley D McDowell; Marcia M Ward; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.